Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Creation of Patient-Specific Silicone Cardiac Models with Applications in Pre-surgical Plans and Hands-on Training
Published on: February 10, 2022
Predictors of Academic Productivity in Cardiac Surgeons: Quality Over Quantity
Anirudha S Chandrabhatla1, Adishesh K Narahari1, Emily D Fronk1
1Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Introduction:
Building a successful academic career is challenging. It is unclear which metrics of academic productivity best predict future success for cardiac surgeons.
Methods:
We collected academic cardiac surgeon profiles from the top 140 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded institutions. Publication information was obtained from Web of Science and the NIH iCite tool. Grant information was collected from NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results. Data were categorized into distinct time periods as follows for each surgeon: last 5 y of training (senior trainee), first 5 y as an attending (junior faculty), and after 5 y as an attending (established faculty). The primary outcomes of: (1) publications as established faculty and (2) receiving a K08 or R01 were analyzed using linear and logistic regression.
Results:
We analyzed 972 academic cardiac surgeons. Total publications as established faculty were predicted by citations per year of papers published as a senior trainee (P = 0.015) but not the number of publications as a senior trainee (P = 0.14). The proportion of basic or translational research (P = 0.27) and first author publications as a senior trainee (P = 0.18) did not predict total publications as established faculty. Being awarded a K08 or R01 was predicted by the number of publications as junior faculty (P = 0.001; odds ratio (OR) 1.02) and whether the surgeon was awarded an F32 (P = 0.0004; OR 3.97) but not the number of publications as a senior trainee (P = 0.49; OR 1.01). Publishing a higher proportion of senior author papers as junior faculty also predicted being awarded a K08 or R01 (P < 0.001; OR 17.15). The surgeons in the top quartile by publication volume varied substantially across career time points.
Conclusions:
Research quality, not quantity, as a trainee predicts future academic productivity as an attending. Cardiac surgery trainees should prioritize learning how to conduct high-quality research and apply those skills as early attendings to position themselves for future academic success.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Exercise and Cardiac Output
Sustained exercise increases the muscles' oxygen demand, which can be...
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
Cardiac Output II: Effect of Stroke Volume on Cardiac Output
Preload
Preload refers to the initial elongation of the cardiac myocytes before contraction and is related to the volume of blood filling the heart at the end of diastole, or end-diastolic volume. The...
Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume
In an average resting adult male, the typical cardiac...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques I
Conscientiousness
Conscientious individuals tend to be organized, responsible, and disciplined. They prioritize completing tasks and following structured routines,...

