Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

Measurement of Liver Stiffness Using Atomic Force Microscopy Coupled with Polarization Microscopy
Published on: July 20, 2022
FibroScan-AST Score vs Liver Stiffness for the Prediction of Liver Events After HCV Cure
Anaïs Corma-Gómez1,2,3, Diana Corona-Mata3,4,5,6, Jésica Martín-Carmona1,2,3,7
1Grupo de Virología Clínica e ITS Cinical Virology and STIs Group, Unit of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, de Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain.
Background:
Liver stiffness (LS) predicts liver complication occurrence in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after sustained virological response (SVR). The FibroScan-AST (FAST) score, which includes aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP; measured by FibroScan), may improve the prediction ability of isolated LS. Our aim was to compare the predictive capacity of LS vs FAST in this setting.
Methods:
Multicenter cohort study including individuals with HIV/HCV coinfection or HCV monoinfection from Spain if they had (1) LS ≥9.5 kPa pretreatment, (2) SVR with a direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-based regimen, and (3) LS and CAP measurement at SVR. Fatty liver disease (FLD) was defined as CAP ≥248 dB/m. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a liver complication (decompensation or hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]) after SVR.
Results:
Three hundred patients were included; 213 (71%) had HIV. At SVR, 131 (44%) had FLD. The FAST score was <0.35 in 182 (61%), 0.35-0.67 in 79 (27%), and >0.67 in 34 (12%) patients. After a median (Q1-Q3) follow-up of 73 (53-83) months, 36 (12%) liver complications (15 [5%] HCC) occurred. LS was independently associated with an increased risk of developing liver complications (sub-hazard ratio [sHR], 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.08; P < .001). In a separate model, FAST ≥0.35 was also independently associated with greater risk of liver complications (sHR, 8.12; 95% CI, 3.11-21.17; P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of the model based on LS was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.91), and that of the model based on FAST was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72-0.88; P = .158).
Conclusions:
The FAST score predicts the development of liver events after SVR but does not improve the predictive capacity of LS alone at this time point.

