Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2025

Early Detection of Cyanobacterial Blooms and Associated Cyanotoxins using Fast Detection Strategy
Published on: February 25, 2021
CGLCS-Net: Addressing Multi-Temporal and Multi-Angle Challenges in Remote Sensing Change Detection
Ke Liu1,2, Hang Xue1,2, Caiyi Huang1,2
1North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering, College of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Langfang 065000, China.
Abstract:
Currently, deep learning networks based on architectures such as CNN and Transformer have achieved significant advances in remote sensing image change detection, effectively addressing the issue of false changes due to spectral and radiometric discrepancies. However, when handling remote sensing image data from multiple sensors, different viewing angles, and extended periods, these models show limitations in modelling dynamic interactions and feature representations in change regions, restricting their ability to model the integrity and precision of irregular change areas. We propose the Context-Aware Global-Local Subspace Attention Change Detection Network (CGLCS-Net) to resolve these issues and introduce the Global-Local Context-Aware Selector (GLCAS) and the Subspace-based Self-Attention Fusion (SSAF) module. GLCAS dynamically selects receptive fields at different feature extraction stages through a joint pooling attention mechanism and depthwise separable convolution, enhancing global context and local feature extraction capabilities and improving feature representation for multi-scale and irregular change regions. The SSAF module establishes dynamic interactions between dual-temporal features via feature decomposition and self-attention mechanisms, focusing on semantic change areas to address challenges such as sensor viewpoint variations and the texture and spectral inconsistencies caused by long periods. Compared to ChangeFormer, CGLCS-Net achieved improvements in the IoU metric of 0.95%, 9.23%, and 13.16% on the three public datasets, i.e., LEVIR-CD, SYSU-CD, and S2Looking, respectively. Additionally, it reduced model parameters by 70.05%, floating-point operations by 7.5%, and inference time by 11.5%. These improvements enhance its applicability for continuous land use and land cover change monitoring.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Global Positioning System Surveys
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
Errors in Global Positioning System
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device
Manipulation and Analysis

