Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

08:27
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
6.9K
Sexting for the Right Reasons: A Longitudinal Mediation Study
Sandra Meier1,2, Silvia Marin-Dragu3, Jennifer L McArthur3
1Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. sandra.meier@iwk.nshealth.ca.
Archives of Sexual Behavior
|May 22, 2025
Summary
Understanding sexting motivations is key. Autonomous motives link to positive outcomes, while controlled motives correlate with negative effects, highlighting the need for awareness rather than abstinence.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Sociology
- Digital Communication
Background:
- Sexting is prevalent among emerging adults.
- Negative portrayals link sexting to risks like cyberbullying and abuse.
- Sexting can also positively impact sexual well-being and relationships.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how motivations for sexting influence its positive and negative outcomes.
- To explore the divergence in sexting's effects based on underlying reasons.
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal online study with 405 emerging adults (18-29 years).
- Participants reported sexting behaviors, autonomous/controlled motivations, and outcomes at two time points (6 weeks apart).
- Structural equation modeling was used for analysis.
Main Results:
- More sexting behaviors directly and indirectly (via controlled motives) predicted negative outcomes.
- More sexting behaviors indirectly predicted positive outcomes via autonomous motives.
- Autonomous motives are associated with beneficial sexting experiences, controlled motives with detrimental ones.
Conclusions:
- The motivations behind sexting significantly shape its outcomes.
- Promoting awareness of sexting motivations can help emerging adults maximize benefits and minimize harm.
- Focusing on *why* individuals sext is more constructive than advocating for abstinence.
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
39.9K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
39.9K
Longitudinal Research
11.9K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
11.9K
Social Exchange Theory
34.4K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.4K
Longitudinal Studies
146
Longitudinal studies are also widely used in other medical and social science fields. For instance, in cardiovascular research, they can monitor patients' health over decades to identify risk factors for heart disease, such as high cholesterol or smoking, and evaluate the long-term effectiveness of preventive measures. Similarly, in mental health studies, researchers might follow individuals from adolescence into adulthood to understand the development and progression of conditions like...
146
Cross-Sectional Research
11.3K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.3K
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
92
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
92

