Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Carcinogen-induced Murine Bladder Tumors
Published on: March 29, 2019
Multimodal Diffusion MRI Synergized with VI-RADS for Precision Grading of Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma: A Prospective
Xiaoxian Zhang1, Shaoyu Wang2, Mengzhu Wang2
1Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China (X.Z., L.W., S.Z., X.C., C.X.).
Rationale And Objectives:
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), mean apparent propagator (MAP), neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), and the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in discriminating the pathological grade of bladder urothelial carcinoma (UCB).
Materials And Methods:
This prospective study enrolled patients with pathologically confirmed UCB between May 2023 and December 2023. Preoperative MRI protocols included spin-echo echo-planner imaging (SE-EPI) and conventional DWI. Quantitative parameters from SE-EPI (DTI, DKI, MAP, NODDI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured. Group comparisons between low-grade and high-grade UCB were performed using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and DeLong's test were used to evaluate diagnostic performance.
Results:
A total of 50 patients with UCB (low-grade/ high-grade = 16/34) were included. VI-RADS score and mean kurtosis (MK) derived from DKI emerged as independent predictors for differentiating low-grade and high-grade UCB (area under the curve (AUC): 0.692 and 0.865, respectively). The combination of VI-RADS and DKI-MK achieved superior diagnostic performance (AUC: 0.915, sensitivity: 0.941) compared to VI-RADS alone (AUC: 0.692, sensitivity: 0.471; p < 0.001) or ADC alone (AUC: 0.787, sensitivity: 0.813; p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Integrating VI-RADS with DKI-MK significantly enhances preoperative assessment of UCB pathological grading, demonstrating higher accuracy and sensitivity than VI-RADS or ADC alone. This approach improves diagnostic objectivity by combining qualitative imaging criteria with quantitative diffusion metrics, offering potential clinical utility for treatment stratification.
More Related Videos
10:25Author Spotlight: Integrating High-Resolution Intravital Imaging and MRI to Enhance Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Planning
Published on: April 12, 2024
06:08A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography