Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
Published on: June 14, 2019
Engage: A bystander intervention training for U.S. Army soldiers
Ian A Gutierrez1, Shelby N Anderson1, Coleen L Crouch1
1Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
The Army's "Engage" bystander intervention training improved soldiers' knowledge and unit engagement but did not significantly increase confidence in intervening. Further tailoring is recommended for military and high-risk occupations.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health
- Military Psychology
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- High-risk occupations face challenges like substance misuse and misconduct.
- Peer intervention is crucial for addressing at-risk behaviors in military settings.
- The U.S. Army developed the
- Engage
- training to empower soldiers in bystander intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the
- Engage
- bystander intervention training.
- To assess changes in soldiers' knowledge, confidence, and unit engagement post-training.
- To identify areas for improvement in military-specific bystander intervention programs.
Main Methods:
- A longitudinal quasi-randomized evaluation was conducted with active-duty soldiers.
- Eight companies received the
- Engage
- training, while eight served as a control group.
- Surveys assessed training acceptability, knowledge, confidence, and unit engagement over nine months.
Main Results:
- Soldiers found the
- Engage
- training acceptable and reported improved knowledge of bystander intervention.
- Perceptions of unit engagement in bystander practices increased over time.
- Soldier confidence in intervening remained high but showed no significant training-induced change.
Conclusions:
- The
- Engage
- training shows potential for enhancing bystander intervention knowledge and unit climate in the military.
- Confidence levels in intervening require further attention and potentially different intervention strategies.
- Tailoring bystander intervention programs is essential for military personnel and other high-risk occupations.
More Related Videos
06:20Author Spotlight: Development of an Automated Camera-Based System for Real-Time Blast Overpressure Monitoring and TBI Risk Assessment in Military Training
Published on: December 6, 2024
07:20Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Bystander Effect
Cognitive Dissonance
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...