Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
Managing for climate and production goals on crop-lands
Shelby C McClelland1,2, Deborah Bossio3, Doria R Gordon4,5
1Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY USA.
Natural climate solutions (NCS) on croplands rarely offer both climate mitigation and crop production benefits. While some practices show short-term gains, long-term impacts often involve trade-offs, suggesting limited roles in food system decarbonization.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Science
- Climate Science
- Environmental Science
Background:
- The potential for crop-land natural climate solutions (NCS) to simultaneously mitigate climate change and enhance crop production is widely assumed but not rigorously evaluated.
- Understanding these dual impacts is crucial for sustainable agriculture and effective climate action.
Purpose of the Study:
- To model greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and crop yields associated with various crop-land NCS strategies.
- To assess the likelihood of achieving "win-win" outcomes (climate benefits and yield increases) across different scenarios and agricultural contexts.
Main Methods:
- Utilized modeling to project GHG emissions and crop yields from crop-land NCS through the end of the century.
- Analyzed specific NCS practices, including grass and legume cover crops with no-tillage farming.
- Investigated the influence of soil properties (nitrogen, clay content) on NCS outcomes.
Main Results:
- Favorable "win-win" outcomes from crop-land NCS were found to be exceptional rather than the norm.
- Grass cover crops with no tillage significantly mitigated GHGs by 2050 but reduced crop yields.
- Legume cover crops with no tillage showed benefits through 2050 but could increase regional GHG emissions by 2100.
- Crop-lands with low soil nitrogen and high clay content were more likely to yield favorable results.
- Avoiding crop losses yielded modest GHG mitigation, indicating limited potential for crop-land soils in overall food system decarbonization.
Conclusions:
- Crop-land NCS present trade-offs between climate mitigation and crop production, challenging the assumption of universal benefits.
- The effectiveness of NCS varies significantly based on the specific practice, region, and soil characteristics.
- Crop-land soils are likely to contribute only a small fraction to the decarbonization of the food system.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
What is Climate?
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Sustainable Development
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Global Climate Change
C4 Pathway and CAM
C4 Pathway
The C4 pathway is used by plants such as...

