Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Sterilization II: Chemical Methods01:30

Methods of Sterilization II: Chemical Methods

6.9K
In healthcare, the chemical method of sterilization uses chemical sterilants to treat surgical instruments and medical supplies to help prevent the transmission of infectious pathogens to patients. Due to heat sensitivity, most medical supplies and equipment should not be exposed to high temperatures. These parts include rubber, plastic, glass, and other similar elements.
Using chemical sterilization rather than heat to clean out equipment is recommended. It eradicates and removes all bacteria,...
6.9K
Chemical Agents for Microbial Control01:27

Chemical Agents for Microbial Control

215
Chemicals play important roles in controlling microbial growth by targeting microbial structures and functions as sanitizers, antiseptics, disinfectants, and sterilants.Alcohols are commonly used sanitizers, effectively disrupting lipid membranes, which compromises cell integrity. They are also used as antiseptics and disinfectants due to their rapid action and versatility.Phenols and their derivatives phenolics , known for denaturing proteins and disrupting cell membranes, are particularly...
215
Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods01:29

Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods

20.9K
As used in a healthcare facility, sterilization destroys all microorganisms through physical or chemical methods. The physical method includes steam, dry heat, boiling water, and radiation.
Steam sterilization uses non-toxic, low-cost moist heat in the form of saturated steam under pressure, which is fast, microbicidal, and sporicidal, and quickly warms and penetrates fabrics. Autoclaves, or steam sterilizers, expose each item to direct steam contact for a predetermined time at the necessary...
20.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Redecorating the Decision Tree.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2026
Same author

Expanding the Use of Moist Heat for Terminal Sterilization.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2024
Same author

Ridding the World of 'Rogues': Improving Vapor-Phase H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> Sterilization and Decontamination Processes.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2023
Same author

Something for Nothing.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2023
Same author

Hydrogen Peroxide Methods for Decontaminating N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.

Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association·2022
Same author

The Boil Test-Strategies for Resistance Determination of Microorganisms.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 19, 2025

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC

Published on: May 10, 2016

12.3K

Biological Indicators, Process Lethality, and Vapor Phase Hydrogen Peroxide Processes.

James Agalloco1

  • 1Agalloco & Associates, PO Box 899, Belle Mead, NJ jagalloco@aol.com.

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
|June 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study examines "rogue" biological indicator results in vapor phase hydrogen peroxide sterilization. Differences in wet vs. dry processes may explain these unexpected decontamination outcomes.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Organic Peroxyacids for Eradicating Dairy Biofilms Using an Approach Combining Static and Dynamic Methods
11:47

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Organic Peroxyacids for Eradicating Dairy Biofilms Using an Approach Combining Static and Dynamic Methods

Published on: December 9, 2022

1.8K
Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
08:49

Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff

Published on: May 15, 2017

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 19, 2025

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC

Published on: May 10, 2016

12.3K
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Organic Peroxyacids for Eradicating Dairy Biofilms Using an Approach Combining Static and Dynamic Methods
11:47

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Organic Peroxyacids for Eradicating Dairy Biofilms Using an Approach Combining Static and Dynamic Methods

Published on: December 9, 2022

1.8K
Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
08:49

Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff

Published on: May 15, 2017

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Sterilization Processes
  • Chemical Decontamination

Background:

  • Biological indicators (BIs) are crucial for validating sterilization efficacy.
  • 'Rogue' BI results in vapor phase hydrogen peroxide (VPHP) processes present a challenge for decontamination validation.
  • Understanding the causes of inconsistent BI performance is essential for ensuring sterile product safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the death curves of biological indicators in VPHP sterilization.
  • To investigate the potential impact of phase differences (wet vs. dry) on BI performance.
  • To provide recommendations for improving VPHP decontamination processes and reducing failures.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of biological indicator death curves.
  • Review of process parameters in vapor phase hydrogen peroxide decontamination.
  • Examination of 'wet' versus 'dry' process conditions.

Main Results:

  • Observed similarities between 'rogue' BI death curves and those from varied process conditions.
  • Phase differences in VPHP processes are a potential cause for 'rogue' BI behavior.
  • Identification of factors contributing to inconsistent BI performance.

Conclusions:

  • Phase differences significantly influence biological indicator performance in VPHP sterilization.
  • Process optimization is necessary to mitigate 'rogue' BI results.
  • Implementing recommendations can enhance the reliability of VPHP decontamination processes.