Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.4K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.4K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.2K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.2K
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility01:34

Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

2.2K
Electrocyclic reactions, cycloadditions, and sigmatropic rearrangements are concerted pericyclic reactions that proceed via a cyclic transition state. These reactions are stereospecific and regioselective. The stereochemistry of the products depends on the symmetry characteristics of the interacting orbitals and the reaction conditions. Accordingly, pericyclic reactions are classified as either symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden. Woodward and Hoffmann presented the selection criteria for...
2.2K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

5.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
5.9K
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination02:52

Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination

11.1K
When a nucleophile and an alkyl halide react, nucleophilic substitution and β-elimination reactions compete to generate products.
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
11.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biological Indicators, Process Lethality, and Vapor Phase Hydrogen Peroxide Processes.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2025
Same author

Expanding the Use of Moist Heat for Terminal Sterilization.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2024
Same author

Ridding the World of 'Rogues': Improving Vapor-Phase H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> Sterilization and Decontamination Processes.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2023
Same author

Something for Nothing.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2023
Same author

Hydrogen Peroxide Methods for Decontaminating N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.

Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association·2022
Same author

The Boil Test-Strategies for Resistance Determination of Microorganisms.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

5.2K

Redecorating the Decision Tree.

James Agalloco1

  • 1Agalloco & Associates, Belle Mead, NJ jagalloco@aol.com.

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
|April 29, 2026
PubMed
Summary

This review compares terminal sterilization regulations, finding the USP general chapter offers a more flexible approach to sterilization cycle development than EMA/PIC/S guidelines.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
  • Sterilization Science
  • Regulatory Affairs

Background:

  • Terminal sterilization is a critical step in ensuring product safety.
  • Regulatory expectations for terminal sterilization processes have evolved significantly.
  • Current guidance includes EMA/PIC/S Decision Trees and USP <1229>.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the historical development of terminal sterilization regulations.
  • To compare the EMA/PIC/S Decision Trees with USP <1229>.
  • To advocate for a more flexible approach to sterilization validation.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of historical regulatory documents.
  • Comparative analysis of EMA/PIC/S and USP guidance documents.
  • Discussion of sterilization cycle development and validation principles.

More Related Videos

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.4K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

5.2K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.4K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.0K

Main Results:

  • The EMA/PIC/S Decision Trees provide specific process recommendations.
  • USP <1229> offers a more adaptable framework for sterilization validation.
  • The two guidance documents present conflicting recommendations.

Conclusions:

  • The USP general chapter's approach to sterilization validation is preferred for its flexibility.
  • Industry best practices should align with adaptable regulatory frameworks.
  • Further harmonization or clarification between global regulatory standards is needed.