Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Methodological recommendations for assessing the impact of adaptations on outcomes in implementation research
Kelly A Aschbrenner1, Borsika A Rabin2,3, Stephen J Bartels4,5
1Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA. kelly.aschbrenner@dartmouth.edu.
Background:
A major gap in implementation research is guidance for designing studies to assess the impact of adaptations to interventions and implementation strategies. Many researchers regard experimental designs as the gold standard. However, the possible study designs for assessing the impact of adaptation on implementation, service and person-level outcomes is broad in scope, including descriptive and correlational research and variations of randomized controlled trials. This article provides a set of key methodological recommendations for assessing the impact of adaptations to interventions and implementation strategies on implementation outcomes.
Recommendations:
We offer four key recommendations for investigating the impact of adaptations on implementation outcomes. First, we recommend defining the construct of adaptations and identifying the type and timing of adaptations. Second, we recommend that study teams identify the expected proximal and distal outcomes of adaptations. Third, we recommend that study teams consider all possible study design options and select the design that is best suited to answer the research question(s), and is feasible given practical and technical constraints, and acceptable to research partners and participants. Fourth, we recommend that study teams consider the type of adaptation and outcome data available, the goals of the adaptation study, and the complexity of the study design when selecting analytic approaches. We provide materials and examples related to the four key recommendations to help study teams plan and conduct adaptation studies.
Conclusions:
This article provides methodological recommendations for assessing the impact of adaptations to interventions and implementation strategies on implementation, service, and person-level outcomes that are grounded in the practical realities of implementation research. Increasing the number of studies examining how, which, and under what conditions adaptations are associated with mechanisms and outcomes will advance research on adaptation.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
01:15Assumptions of Survival Analysis
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
01:20Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
02:01Group Design