Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026

11:01
SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
Published on: November 24, 2015
13.3K
Collaborating with a robot biases human spatial attention
Giulia Scorza Azzarà1,2, Joshua Zonca3, Francesco Rea3
1Robotics Brain and Cognitive Sciences Unit, Italian Institute of Technology, 16152 Genoa, GE, Italy.
Iscience
|July 3, 2025
Summary
Human-robot interaction (HRI) can influence visual processing. Collaborative robots with hands can capture human attention, similar to human hands, affecting spatial awareness and body schema integration.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Science
- Human-Robot Interaction
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Human-robot interaction (HRI) is increasingly accessible.
- The near-hand effect demonstrates how hand proximity enhances spatial attention.
- Attentional priority can extend to a collaborator's hand, integrating it into the body schema.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if a robot's anthropomorphic hand can bias human attentional priority.
- To understand how HRI influences human visual processing and body schema.
- To identify social and kinematic factors enhancing attentional shifts in HRI.
Main Methods:
- Experimental investigation of human visual processing during collaborative HRI.
- Comparison of target detection near a robot's hand before and after interaction.
- Analysis of social and kinematic cues influencing joint body schema formation.
Main Results:
- Collaborative HRI facilitated target detection near the robot's hand.
- This attentional bias was absent prior to the interaction.
- Specific social and kinematic metrics were found to enhance joint body schema formation and attentional shifts.
Conclusions:
- HRI can significantly shape human visual processing and attentional biases.
- Robotic hands can be integrated into the human body schema during collaboration.
- Findings offer insights into the perceptual and cognitive effects of interacting with robotic systems.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Content Model
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...

