Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
Published on: December 15, 2023
Machine learning-driven analysis of student evaluation comments: Advancing beyond manual coding through a combined
Mohammed A Islam1, Suhui Yang1, Alamdar Hussain1
1American University of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Signal Hill, CA, USA.
Introduction:
This study examines pharmacy students' qualitative faculty and course evaluation (FCE) feedback through an integrated machine learning and human coding approach to uncover insights on faculty teaching, course quality, and areas for improvements, informing instructional enhancement.
Methods:
Between 2019 and 2023, text data from 1267 FCEs were compiled and analyzed using WordStat, a text mining software. The content analysis primarily relied on machine learning techniques, including word clustering, word co-occurrence mapping, phrase extraction, and topic modeling, to uncover patterns in the student feedback data. To enhance interpretive depth and ensure contextual accuracy, a supplemental manual thematic analysis was conducted using both deductive and inductive coding approaches. Descriptive statistics were applied to quantify and interpret the frequency of identified codes and themes.
Results:
Word cluster analysis identified commonly cited words and their co-occurrences, including professor, class, students, teaching, great, materials, and lectures. The frequently occurring phrases included excellent professor, great professor, excellent teaching style, knowledgeable professors, caring professors, flexible with students, and goes extra miles. The topics with high coherence values included understanding the materials, great professors, real-life experience, knowledgeable professor, excellent content, waste of time, and reading the slides. The manual coding analysis identified 1088 codes grouped under 38 subthemes constituting three major themes including faculty personal attributes (45.86 % of codes), faculty teaching effectiveness (28.92 %), and course quality (23.24 %).
Conclusions:
This study highlights the value of analyzing open-ended FCE comments by utilizing machine learning to gain meaningful insights that deepen understanding of the student learning experience. Educators and curriculum planners in health professions education can make data-informed decisions, improve curriculum design, and enhance teaching effectiveness by thoughtfully integrating student feedback into program-level reviews.
More Related Videos
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
10:43Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes
Published on: June 10, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Sieve Analysis and Grading Curves
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...