Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Ultrasound Guided Venous Access for Cardiac Devices: Defining Learning Curve for Safety, Efficacy, and Radiation
Anish N Bhuva1,2, Hnin Zaw1,2, Adam Graham1
1Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Background:
There is limited real-world experience of the learning curve for ultrasound (US) guided axillary venous access for cardiac device implantation, and it is usually performed before cutaneous incision. We investigated the learning curve, radiation exposure, safety, and efficacy of US-guided venous access in standard workflow.
Methods:
US-guided access was performed by an experienced electrophysiologist with no prior application of the technique by using a standard vascular US probe and minimal modification to workflow. The learning curve was evaluated using access time (needle-to-wire time). Complications were recorded until hospital discharge, and efficacy was defined by procedural success. Radiation dose savings were estimated based on fluoroscopy time for access, and a control group underwent conventional fluoroscopy landmark-guided access (n = 44 punctures).
Results:
147 US-guided punctures were performed in 74 patients for one (8%), two (71%), or three (17%) leads, or upgrades (4%). Access was successful in 97% (n = 72). There were no access-related peri-procedural complications. First US-guided access time was 30 seconds (interquartile range [IQR]: 17,60), and was similar to fluoroscopy-guided access time (43 seconds, IQR: 24,58; p = 0.45). Access time stabilized after 45 procedures, decreasing from 81 (IQR: 61,90) to 16 seconds (IQR: 10,20) from the first to the last 15 procedures (p < 0.001). 96% (n = 69) did not require fluoroscopy. 4% (n = 3) required 1 second fluoroscopy to confirm wire position after difficult passage. Estimated radiation exposure saving from controls was 30 seconds (IQR: 15,78) of fluoroscopy, resulting in 0.4 (IQR: 0.26,1.7) mGy cumulative skin dose, equivalent to 1.3 (95% confidence interval: 0.26,1.45) patient chest radiograph radiation exposure.
Conclusion:
US-guided axillary venous access for cardiac device implantation is feasible in a standard workflow and reduces radiation exposure. The learning curve time is acceptable, and the procedure is safe, even during training.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

