Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

07:12
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
Published on: April 11, 2025
561
The Development and Implementation of a Simulated Patient Resource for Teaching and Assessment in Optometry Low
Marek Karas1, Natalie Lucas1, Barbara Ryan1
1School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Clinical Optometry
|August 5, 2025
Summary
A new simulated patient resource for low vision rehabilitation training was broadly accepted by students and assessors. While effective for teaching and assessment, real patient encounters remain preferred for optometric education.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology and Optometry
- Medical Education
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote learning solutions in optometric education.
- Low vision rehabilitation training requires practical, hands-on experience that was disrupted by restrictions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a simulated patient resource for teaching and assessing low vision rehabilitation.
- To determine the acceptability of this resource among students, assessors, and simulated patients.
- To inform potential future integration into optometric curricula.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods case study approach was employed.
- Evaluations included perspectives from 7 students, 5 assessors, and 5 simulated patients.
- The study focused on acceptability and consensus, not educational impact or validation.
Main Results:
- Broad acceptance of the simulated patient resource for both teaching and assessment (mean scores 7.3-9.6/10).
- Simulated patients found their preparation adequate; students and assessors showed no significant difference in acceptance.
- Positive feedback highlighted detailed scenarios and pre-session training; the College of Optometrists deemed it acceptable.
Conclusions:
- The simulated patient resource is broadly accepted for teaching and assessing low vision practice.
- Significant time and resources are needed for guideline-compliant implementation in high-stakes assessments.
- Further research is required to assess educational impact and validity; real patient encounters remain the preferred method.

