Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Remote Laboratory Management: Respiratory Virus Diagnostics
Published on: April 6, 2019
World Health Organization Event-Based Surveillance During the First 4 Months of the 2022 Ukraine Crisis
Grace Brough1, Ingrid Hammermeister Nezu1, Kazuki Shimizu1
1Grace Brough, MPH, Ingrid Hammermeister Nezu, MSc, Kazuki Shimizu, MD, MSc, PhD, Juniorcaius Ikejezie, MSc, PhD, Zyleen Alnashir Kassamali, MBBS, MPH, Emily Dorothee Meyer, MD, MSc, Bernadette Basuta Mirembe, MVPH, Maria Elizabeth Mitri, MPH, Veronica Cristea, MD, Friday Elaigwu Idoko, MD, MPH, Brian Ngongheh Ajong, MD, MPH, and Ojong Ojong Ejoh, MPH, are Epidemiologists; Olivier le Polain de Waroux, MD, MSc, PhD, FFPH, and Boris Igor Pavlin, MD, MPH, are Unit Heads; and Altaf Musani, MPH, and Abdi Rahman Mahamud, are Directors; all in the Health Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization (WHO) Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland. Sarah Mesbah Abdulhady, MPH, is an Epidemiologist; Silviu Ciobanu, MD, MPH, is a Programme Area Manager; and Heather Eve Papowitz, MD, MPH, is an Incident Manager; all in the Health Emergencies Programme, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark. Aron Kassahun Aregay, MPH, is a Public Health Intelligence and Information Management Officer; Alina Kovalchuk, MD, MPH, is a Health Information Management Officer; and Liudmyla Slobodianyk, MD, MPH, MSc, is an Epidemiologist; all in the Health Emergencies Programme, WHO Ukraine Country Office, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Abstract:
Following a nearly decade-long war in Eastern Ukraine, the conflict escalated in February 2022, and the World Health Organization swiftly began enhanced event-based surveillance (EBS) for the early detection of public health threats in Ukraine and refugee-hosting countries. The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics and trends of signals documented by WHO, especially examining how potential threats to human health in Ukraine and other affected countries were identified and presented during the first 4 months of the Ukraine crisis. The EBS process relied on the daily screening of information coming from different sources, and signals were categorized by public health risks. Between February 26 and June 30, 2022, a total of 208,484 articles were screened in the Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources system and other sources, identifying 832 recorded signals. Most (94.1%) signals were reported within 2 days of publication of the relevant pieces of information. The most common categories of signals reported were "healthcare capacity" (n=283, 34.0%), followed by "technological hazards" (n=129, 15.5%), "population movement" (n=80, 9.6%), and "infectious diseases" (n=79, 9.5%). Among all signals, 85.5% were relevant to Ukraine. In Ukraine, the largest number of signals (20.4%) were reported from the city of Donetska. Although, resource intensiveness and appropriate balance for desired sensitivity and scope remains a challenge, EBS remains a vital surveillance method to rapidly identify potential health threats during public health events and humanitarian crises-when routine surveillance is weak or disrupted-and to contribute crucial data to guide health information management and planning.
Related Concept Videos
Principles of Disease Surveillance
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...

