Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Battery Longevity in Modern Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization
Kotaro Nishino1, Taro Temma1, Masaya Watanabe2
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Boston Scientific devices offer superior battery longevity for high-voltage devices like implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (CRT-Ds), reducing replacement needs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Battery longevity in high-voltage devices (HVDs) is crucial for patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.
- Variability in battery performance exists among major manufacturers of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (CRT-Ds).
- This study evaluates battery longevity and influencing factors in HVDs implanted at a single institution.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare battery longevity across major manufacturers of ICDs and CRT-Ds.
- To identify factors affecting battery depletion in these high-voltage devices.
- To inform device selection for improved patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 353 patients implanted with HVDs (Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic) between 2012-2021.
- Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models analyzed device longevity, with battery depletion as the primary endpoint.
- Multivariate analysis adjusted for potential confounding factors.
Main Results:
- Boston Scientific devices demonstrated significantly longer battery life compared to Abbott and Medtronic (p < 0.001).
- Six-year replacement-free survival was 99% for ICDs and 93% for CRT-Ds.
- Device manufacturer, type (ICD vs. CRT-D), and ventricular pacing rate independently predicted battery depletion (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- Significant differences in battery longevity exist among HVD manufacturers, impacting device selection.
- Longer battery life can decrease replacement frequency, potentially improving patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
- Manufacturer choice is a key consideration for optimizing HVD performance and patient care.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
08:43Advanced Cardiac Rhythm Management by Applying Optogenetic Multi-Site Photostimulation in Murine Hearts
Published on: August 26, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use