Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
Published on: May 25, 2020
On the Feasibility of Accelerating Glaucoma Clinical Trials Using Portable Perimetry.
Jeremy C K Tan1, Giovanni Montesano2, Jonathan Crowston3
1Department of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health & Medical Sciences, City St George's, University of London, London, England; Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Ophthalmology, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Home visual field testing can detect glaucoma progression faster than standard methods, even with less reliable devices. Increased testing frequency with portable perimetry may reduce clinical trial sample sizes.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Clinical Trials
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Glaucoma progression is typically monitored using in-clinic visual field (VF) tests.
- Portable, home-based perimetry offers potential for more frequent monitoring.
- Assessing the utility of home perimetry in detecting glaucoma progression is crucial for clinical trial design.
Purpose of the Study:
- To model the effectiveness of frequent (weekly, monthly) home visual field assessments in detecting glaucoma progression within a clinical trial setting.
- To compare the performance of portable perimetry against standard in-clinic devices for glaucoma progression detection.
- To evaluate the impact of home perimetry on clinical trial sample size requirements.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study with simulations involving 40 patients (78 eyes) with varying glaucoma status.
- Participants underwent both portable (Eyecatcher v3.0; EC3) and reference (HFA SITA-Fast) visual field tests.
- Linear mixed modeling was used to predict the proportion of progressors detected under different testing frequencies and variability levels.
Main Results:
- The portable perimeter (EC3) showed lower reliability (CoRMD95% = 6.37 dB) compared to the reference device (HFA; 4.25 dB).
- Simulations indicated that monthly EC3 testing could detect a higher proportion of progressors than quarterly HFA testing.
- Frequent home testing (monthly/fortnightly) could decrease required clinical trial sample sizes by 24.3%/36.3% for detecting a 20% reduction in progression.
Conclusions:
- Home visual field assessments, despite lower device reliability, enable faster and greater detection of glaucoma progression through increased testing frequency.
- The use of home perimetry in clinical trials may significantly reduce the number of participants needed.
- Further considerations regarding duration, access, and cost-effectiveness of home-based glaucoma monitoring are warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Glaucoma: Overview
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment

