Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
Adversity is associated with lower general processing speed rather than executive functioning
Stefan Vermeent1, Anna-Lena Schubert2, Willem E Frankenhuis1
1Department of Evolutionary and Population Biology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam.
Adversity exposure, particularly threat in adulthood, negatively impacts general processing speed, not specific executive functions (EF). Childhood adversity affects processing speed and task-specific information accumulation, not distinct EF abilities. This suggests EF research may overestimate adversity's impact on specific cognitive skills.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Psychometrics
Background:
- Adversity exposure is linked to executive functioning (EF) deficits or adaptations.
- Current research often uses raw performance metrics, conflating cognitive processes and task-general abilities.
- Distinguishing task-general factors from specific EF abilities is crucial for accurate assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To integrate deficit and adaptation frameworks of adversity and EF.
- To differentiate task-general cognitive processes from specific EF abilities using cognitive modeling.
- To investigate the associations between childhood and adulthood adversity exposure and distinct cognitive processes.
Main Methods:
- Employed drift diffusion modeling to isolate information accumulation, response caution, and stimulus encoding/response execution speeds.
- Utilized structural equation modeling to examine task-general versus ability-specific associations.
- Recruited 1,061 participants and administered processing speed, inhibition, and attention-shifting tasks, alongside self-reported adversity measures.
Main Results:
- Adulthood threat exposure negatively correlated with task-general processing speed.
- After controlling for task-general processes, no significant associations remained with inhibition or attention-shifting abilities.
- Childhood deprivation and threat exposure were linked to reduced general processing speed and task-specific information accumulation, reflecting task nuances rather than specific EF.
Conclusions:
- Raw performance measures in EF research may inflate the perceived impact of adversity on specific cognitive abilities.
- Cognitive modeling offers a more nuanced approach to understanding the relationship between adversity and cognitive processes.
- Future research should employ advanced modeling techniques to disentangle task-general effects from specific EF abilities when studying adversity impacts.
More Related Videos
09:01A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
Published on: May 7, 2014
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Information Processing Approach
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Cognitive Development During Adulthood
Language and Cognition
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory