Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Raman Spectroscopy: Overview01:20

Raman Spectroscopy: Overview

593
The underlying principle of Raman spectroscopy is based on the interaction between light and matter, specifically molecules' inelastic scattering of photons. When a monochromatic beam of light, typically from a laser source, interacts with a sample, most scattered light has the same frequency as the incident light. This is known as Rayleigh scattering.
However, a small fraction of the scattered light exhibits a frequency shift due to the exchange of energy between the incident photons and...
593
Raman Spectroscopy Instrumentation: Overview01:26

Raman Spectroscopy Instrumentation: Overview

530
A conventional Raman spectrophotometer includes a laser source, a sample holding system, a wavelength selector, and a detector.
The monochromatic laser source, typically using visible or near-infrared radiation, generates a highly focused beam of light. This light interacts with the molecules of the sample, scattering some of the light. Liquid and gaseous samples are usually tested in ordinary glass capillaries, while solids can be analyzed as powders packed in capillaries or as potassium...
530

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatially and Chemically Specific Optical Control of Cells via Supervised and Automated Target Selection.

ACS photonics·2026
Same author

Crosstalk-Free Real-Time Precision Opto-Control of Biochemical Processes Through Intra-Pixel Optical Decoupling.

Chemistry methods : new approaches to solving problems in chemistry·2026
Same author

Interface-Sensitive Epi-Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Microscopy for Imaging Cell Adhesion Dynamics.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same author

Mammals that can develop type 2 diabetes have a similarly structured β-sheet amyloid oligomer.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

In Situ Microscopy for Real-Time Visualization of Microcarrier Cell Cultures for Live Virus Vaccine Process Development.

Biotechnology and bioengineering·2026
Same author

Interface-Sensitive Epi-Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Microscopy for Imaging Cell Adhesion Dynamics.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Ultrafast Time-resolved Near-IR Stimulated Raman Measurements of Functional π-conjugate Systems
09:57

Ultrafast Time-resolved Near-IR Stimulated Raman Measurements of Functional π-conjugate Systems

Published on: February 10, 2020

7.3K

Spontaneous or Stimulated? Investigating Raman's Detection Limits in Aqueous Environments.

Karsten J Mohn1, Bin Dong1, Shivam Mahapatra1

  • 1James Tarpo Jr. and Margaret Tarpo Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Dr., West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B
|September 3, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study compares spontaneous Raman scattering (spRS) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) spectroscopy for detecting analytes in water. SRS offers faster, more sensitive chemical analysis, especially under optimized conditions, outperforming spRS.

More Related Videos

Non-contact, Label-free Monitoring of Cells and Extracellular Matrix using Raman Spectroscopy
13:48

Non-contact, Label-free Monitoring of Cells and Extracellular Matrix using Raman Spectroscopy

Published on: May 29, 2012

17.1K
Label-Free Imaging of Lipid Storage Dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans using Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy
10:59

Label-Free Imaging of Lipid Storage Dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans using Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy

Published on: May 28, 2021

4.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Ultrafast Time-resolved Near-IR Stimulated Raman Measurements of Functional π-conjugate Systems
09:57

Ultrafast Time-resolved Near-IR Stimulated Raman Measurements of Functional π-conjugate Systems

Published on: February 10, 2020

7.3K
Non-contact, Label-free Monitoring of Cells and Extracellular Matrix using Raman Spectroscopy
13:48

Non-contact, Label-free Monitoring of Cells and Extracellular Matrix using Raman Spectroscopy

Published on: May 29, 2012

17.1K
Label-Free Imaging of Lipid Storage Dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans using Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy
10:59

Label-Free Imaging of Lipid Storage Dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans using Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy

Published on: May 28, 2021

4.3K

Area of Science:

  • Spectroscopy
  • Chemical Analysis
  • Biophysical Techniques

Background:

  • Raman spectroscopy, including spontaneous Raman scattering (spRS) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS), is vital for chemical composition analysis.
  • spRS offers complete spectra but suffers from low signal levels and long integration times.
  • SRS provides stronger signals for rapid chemical imaging, though experimental comparisons of its limit of detection (LOD) are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally compare the limit of detection (LOD) of frequency-domain spRS and SRS spectroscopy.
  • To introduce a simplified methodology for LOD estimation in linear spectroscopy.
  • To identify optimal conditions for SRS spectroscopy and assess factors affecting its LOD.

Main Methods:

  • A novel LOD estimation method using three measurements to determine dilution maximum, simplifying conventional serial dilution.
  • Comprehensive comparison of spRS and SRS LOD for water-soluble analytes in aqueous solutions.
  • Assessment of factors influencing SRS LOD, including spectral acquisition time and noise sources.

Main Results:

  • SRS exhibits shot-noise-limited performance at short acquisition times.
  • Photothermal effects and low-frequency noise can degrade SRS performance at longer acquisition times.
  • Optimized SRS detected ~700 μM DMSO, 1 g/L glucose, and 1 g/L protein in water, surpassing spRS under similar or longer integration times.

Conclusions:

  • Optimized SRS spectroscopy provides sensitive and rapid detection of analytes in aqueous solutions.
  • The simplified LOD estimation method facilitates rapid evaluation of spectroscopic parameters.
  • SRS shows potential for enhanced chemical analysis in biological and aqueous environments, outperforming spRS in speed and sensitivity.