Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Composition and Properties of Aquafaba: Water Recovered from Commercially Canned Chickpeas
Published on: February 10, 2018
Characterization and comparative study of flavor profiles of soy, pea, mung bean, chickpea, faba bean, and peanut
Longbei Xiang1, Bo Jiang1,2, Rong Wei1
1School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Background:
Plant proteins, especially legume proteins, have garnered widespread attention due to their rich nutritional value and numerous health benefits. In this study, the flavor properties of soy, pea, mung bean, chickpea, faba bean, and peanut proteins were analyzed and compared using rapid gas chromatography electronic nose (GC-E-Nose), headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS), and headspace gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS) coupled with chemometrics.
Results:
GC-E-Nose analysis showed a distinct difference in the volatile compounds of six legume proteins. A total of 208 and 101 volatile compounds were identified using GC-MS and GC-IMS, respectively, with aldehydes, alcohols, and ketones being the main volatile components. Among the six legume proteins, chickpea protein possessed the highest content of volatile compounds, whereas peanut protein contained the largest number of volatile compounds. In the meanwhile, 40 and 33 compounds with variable importance in the projection (VIP) greater than 1 were screened using orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), of which 15 (hexanal, nonanal, 2,6-dimethylpyrazine, heptan-2-one, 2,5-dimethylpyrazine, pentan-1-ol, tridecane, tetradecane, oct-3-en-2-one, 1,4-xylene, hexanoic acid, dodecane, 2-pentylfuran, hexan-1-ol, pentanal), and 3 (propan-2-ol, heptan-2-one-D, pentan-1-ol-D) compounds with VIP > 2, respectively. These volatiles were the key differential compounds that distinguished the six legume proteins. GC-MS combined with odor activity value (OAV) identified 35 flavor compounds as key odor active compounds with OAV > 1.
Conclusion:
The combined application of these techniques better characterized the flavor profile differences among legume proteins, providing theoretical guidance for developing new plant-based alternative protein products. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry.
More Related Videos
08:43PTR-ToF-MS Coupled with an Automated Sampling System and Tailored Data Analysis for Food Studies: Bioprocess Monitoring, Screening and Nose-space Analysis
Published on: May 11, 2017
05:29Profiling Volatile Compounds in Blackcurrant Fruit using Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled to Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 9, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry
This technique helps gather information regarding the protein from which the peptide was obtained and to study the peptides’ amino acid sequence. Identifying peptides from a complex mixture is an important component of the growing field of...