Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Consistency of Blood Pressure Measurement Methods in Atrial Fibrillation
Shadi Mostafavi1, Majid Haji Karimi2, Ali Pazoki2
1Clinical Research Development Unit of Advanced Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation patients shows a significant difference between oscillometric and auscultatory methods, particularly for systolic readings. This impacts hypertension diagnosis and treatment reliability.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Hypertension Management
Background:
- Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement is vital for hypertension management in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.
- The agreement between oscillometric and auscultatory BP measurement methods in AF patients is not well-established.
- This study investigates BP measurement consistency in AF patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability and agreement of oscillometric versus auscultatory BP measurement techniques.
- To identify potential discrepancies in BP readings between the two methods in patients with atrial fibrillation.
- To inform clinical practice regarding BP monitoring in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 100 patients with atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm.
- Blood pressure was measured three times using both the auscultatory (Korotkoff sounds) and oscillometric methods.
- Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, with P-values < 0.05 considered significant.
Main Results:
- A significant difference was observed in systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurements between the two methods in AF patients (P=0.003).
- Mean SBP by oscillometric method: 127.29±21.51 mmHg (AF group); by auscultatory method: 131.07±23.72 mmHg (AF group).
- The discrepancy between methods was significant for heart rates of 80 bpm and higher (P=0.017).
Conclusions:
- While a significant correlation exists between oscillometric and auscultatory BP measurements in AF patients, a notable difference in SBP was found.
- The findings highlight potential variability in BP assessment for atrial fibrillation patients.
- Further research may be needed to refine BP measurement protocols for this demographic.
Related Concept Videos
Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Measurement of Blood Pressure

