Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
A qualitative evaluation of the Research Equity and Diversity Initiative's (READI) research support voucher program
Perusi B Muhigaba1, Jessica Sperling1,2, Sally Taylor3
1Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract:
The Duke Research Equity and Diversity Initiative (READI) was established in 2021 to engage Durham and surrounding communities in clinical research and build capacity to promote equitable access to research participation. Within READI, a voucher program was launched with the goals of increasing diverse participation in clinical research, improving community-partnered research, and enhancing community engagement. The vouchers leveraged a stand-alone, community-centered, outpatient research clinic, the Duke Research at Pickett (R@P) facility, which was originally opened to support COVID-19 trials. A formative evaluation of the voucher program was conducted with 3 voucher-awarded teams, READI personnel, and R@P staff. Data included 18 semi-structured interviews (n = 14) over two timepoints (Spring 2023, 2024). A rapid response analysis approach was used. Data indicate that READI voucher-awarded services were useful for voucher teams, with value for supporting community-engaged efforts, making research participation accessible, creating a community-centered and streamlined service facility, and personnel development benefits. Communication and flexibility of support services facilitated program implementation. Challenges occurred in service utilization logistics and incorporating community engagement into research support services. Ultimately, we find that a research support program with embedded community engagement support is feasible; this type of support can be integral in normalizing community-engaged research.
More Related Videos
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Equity Theory
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Ethics in Research
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...