Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

230
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
230
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

296
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
296
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

365
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
365
Bias01:22

Bias

7.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.2K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.0K
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

185
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
185

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural Timeline of Contextual Guidance in Naturalistic Visual Search Across Task Difficulty Levels.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Topological phase transition in antisymmetric Lotka-Volterra doublet chain.

Physical review. E·2025
Same author

How combined pairwise and higher-order interactions shape transient dynamics.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

Response of a three-species cyclic ecosystem to a short-lived elevation of death rate.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Reversing food preference through multisensory exposure.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Erratum: "Controlling species densities in structurally perturbed intransitive cycles with higher-order interactions" [Chaos 32(10), 103122 (2022)].

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2023
Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Probing Prediction-Related Processes in Language Using an EEG Word Stem Completion Paradigm.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

sBOSC: A Method for Source-Level Identification of Neural Oscillations in Electromagnetic Brain Signals.

Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K

Fairness, Not Emotion, Drives Socioeconomic Decision-Making.

Rudra Mukhopadhyay1,2, Sourin Chatterjee2,3, Koel Das2

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Haringhata Farm, West Bengal, India.

Psychophysiology
|December 20, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Economic fairness significantly impacts socioeconomic decisions, more than proposer emotions. Neural markers recognized emotions but minimally influenced decision-making in this ultimatum game study.

Keywords:
emotion perceptionneuroeconomicsrational behaviorsocial decision‐makingultimatum game

More Related Videos

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.3K
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.3K
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Socioeconomic decisions are influenced by emotion and fairness.
  • The neurocognitive mechanisms underlying these decisions are not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interplay between proposer emotions and offer fairness in rational decision-making.
  • To analyze neural markers associated with emotional recognition and decision processes.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an ultimatum game paradigm with 40 participants.
  • Exposed participants to varying proposer emotions (Happy, Neutral, Disgusted) and offer ranges (Low, Intermediate, High).
  • Employed electroencephalography (EEG) to analyze event-related potentials (ERPs) like N170, Late Positive Potential (LPP), Feedback Related Negativity (FRN), and P3a.

Main Results:

  • Economic fairness (offer amount) was the dominant predictor of acceptance rates.
  • Neural markers confirmed facial expression recognition but had minimal impact on the socioeconomic decision itself.
  • Participant responses were clustered into five distinct strategies, supported by the Drift Diffusion Model.

Conclusions:

  • Economic fairness plays a more critical role than proposer emotions in socioeconomic decision-making.
  • While neural systems recognize emotions, their influence on rational economic choices in this context is limited.
  • Individualistic decision-making strategies vary, highlighting diverse cognitive approaches.