Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

11:58
Minimally Invasive Thumb-sized Pterional Craniotomy for Surgical Clip Ligation of Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
Published on: August 11, 2015
16.1K
Endovascular Treatment and Microsurgical Clipping for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comprehensive Comparative Study
Shivender Sobti1, Jagminder Singh1, Saurabh Sharma1
1Department of Neurosurgery, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Old Campus, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
International Journal of Applied & Basic Medical Research
|January 9, 2026
Summary
Microsurgical clipping and endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms both show effectiveness. Endovascular treatment offers a less invasive approach with shorter hospital stays, while clipping provides durable occlusion for complex cases.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Interventional Neurology
Background:
- Intracranial aneurysms can rupture, causing subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with severe neurological deficits.
- Endovascular treatment presents a minimally invasive alternative to surgical clipping, potentially reducing morbidity and improving recovery.
- Comparing clinical profiles, outcomes, and prognostic factors of both treatment modalities is crucial for optimal patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors between microsurgical clipping and endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms.
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of both surgical and endovascular approaches in managing intracranial aneurysms.
- To identify predictors of poor outcomes in patients undergoing treatment for intracranial aneurysms.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 103 patients treated for intracranial aneurysms between January 2018 and December 2023.
- Data collection included demographics, clinical presentation, aneurysm characteristics, and treatment details for both microsurgical clipping (n=53) and endovascular treatment (n=50) groups.
- Statistical analyses, including Chi-square and t-tests, were employed to compare outcomes and identify significant predictors of poor prognosis.
Main Results:
- No significant age difference between clipping (52.43 years) and endovascular (54.42 years) groups (P=0.951).
- Microsurgical clipping had a significantly longer operative time (120.5 min) compared to endovascular treatment (68.53 min, P<0.001).
- Higher postoperative complications were observed in the clipping group, though endovascular patients experienced shorter hospital stays (18.30 days vs. 27.55 days, P=0.162).
Conclusions:
- Both endovascular treatment and microsurgical clipping are effective for intracranial aneurysms, with distinct advantages.
- Endovascular treatment offers a less invasive option with shorter hospital stays and potentially better long-term outcomes.
- Microsurgical clipping ensures durable occlusion and is vital for complex aneurysms; treatment choice requires individualization based on aneurysm and patient factors.
Keywords:
Endovascular treatmentintracranial aneurysmsmicrosurgical clippingprognostic factorssubarachnoid hemorrhagetreatment outcomes
