Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Preparation and Characterization of Novel HDL-mimicking Nanoparticles for Nerve Growth Factor Encapsulation
Published on: May 22, 2017
U-Shaped Lipid-CVD Links in Older Adults: Reversed LDL-C and HDL-C Associations and Goldilocks Zone
Xiaoxin Ye1, Shengyan Du1, Shimin Chen1
1Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China; Institute of Geriatrics, Beijing Key Laboratory of Geriatric Comorbidity, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics Diseases, Second Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Insights
Maintaining optimal cholesterol levels is crucial for older adults to minimize cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. This study identifies specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ranges associated with the lowest CVD risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Geriatric Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Current guidelines lack consistent lipid management targets for older adults.
- Existing recommendations do not adequately address specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ranges for this demographic.
- This gap necessitates research into optimal lipid management strategies for elderly populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the associations between LDL-C and HDL-C levels and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in individuals aged 60 and older.
- To identify optimal target ranges for LDL-C and HDL-C management in older adults to reduce CVD risk.
- To inform evidence-based guidelines for lipid management in geriatric populations.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 217,442 U.K. Biobank participants aged 60 years and above, excluding those with pre-existing CVD or cancer.
- Employed multivariable Cox regression models and restricted cubic splines to analyze the relationship between lipid levels and CVD outcomes.
- Estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify CVD risk associated with varying LDL-C and HDL-C concentrations.
Main Results:
- LDL-C demonstrated a U-shaped association with both incident CVD and CVD mortality, with minimal risk observed between 3.600-4.204 mmol/L.
- HDL-C showed an L-shaped association with incident CVD but a U-shaped association with CVD mortality, with minimal mortality risk between 1.421-1.699 mmol/L.
- Higher LDL-C (Q1) and lower HDL-C (Q6) were associated with increased CVD risk and mortality, with combined lipid levels further modifying risk.
Conclusions:
- The U/L-shaped relationships of LDL-C and HDL-C with CVD risk in older adults highlight the need for precise lipid management.
- A specific "Goldilocks zone" for lipid levels is associated with minimized CVD risk in this age group.
- Findings indicate limitations in current guidelines and emphasize the importance of individualized lipid targets for older adults.
Background:
Guidelines and consensus statements lack consistent management targets and ranges for low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in older adults.
Objectives:
The objectives of the study were to investigate the relationships of LDL-C and HDL-C with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in older adults and to identify optimal target ranges for their management.
Methods:
This study included 217,442 U.K. Biobank participants aged ≥60 years, free of CVD and cancer at baseline. Multivariable Cox regression models and restricted cubic splines were employed to estimate HRs and 95% CIs for the associations of LDL-C and HDL-C levels with CVD outcome.
Results:
During follow-up, 26,756 CVDs and 2,726 CVD deaths occurred. LDL-C exhibited U-shaped relationships with both incident CVD and CVD mortality (minimal risk: 3.600-4.204 mmol/L). HDL-C showed an L-shaped association with incident CVD but a U-shaped association with CVD mortality (minimal risk: 1.421-1.699 mmol/L). Compared with the reference LDL-C group, the Q1 group had a 39% higher incident CVD risk (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.32-1.47) and 27% higher CVD mortality risk (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.08-1.48). Conversely, compared with the reference HDL-C group, the Q6 group was associated with a lower incident CVD (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.84-0.97) and higher CVD mortality risk (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.01-1.51). Notably, the CVD risk rose progressively with joint LDL-C and HDL-C risk tiers.
Conclusions:
U/L-shaped associations of LDL-C and HDL-C with CVD risk in older adults underscore the importance of maintaining lipids within an optimal range. This distinct "Goldilocks zone" is associated with minimized risk and highlights current guideline limitations.
Related Concept Videos
Hybrid Zones
Covalently Linked Protein Regulators
These groups modify specific amino acids in a protein....
Structure of Lipids
Zones of Protection
Protective zones are defined by closed dashed lines, containing one or more components. A key characteristic of these zones is the strategic placement of...
What are Lipids?
Transition Zone

