Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Exploring Clinician Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: Qualitative Systematic Review and
Robin Bogdanffy1, Alisa Mundzic1, Peter Nymberg2,3
1General Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Huvudbyggnad Vasaparken, Universitetsplatsen 1, Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden, 46 317860000.
Clinicians see artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool that can improve primary health care but also introduce complexities. Careful consideration of ethical, technical, and human oversight is crucial for successful AI integration.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Qualitative Research Synthesis
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential benefits for clinical and administrative tasks in healthcare.
- Significant challenges include potential biases, regulatory gaps, and technical issues associated with AI.
- Limited qualitative research exists on clinician perspectives regarding AI in primary care settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and synthesize current qualitative research on clinician perspectives of AI in primary care.
- To understand the multifaceted views of healthcare professionals on AI adoption and impact.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of multiple databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL) up to February 2024.
- Inclusion of peer-reviewed English-language qualitative studies using the SPIDER framework.
- Thematic synthesis of data from 13 studies, with quality appraisal using CASP and confidence assessment using GRADE-CERQual.
Main Results:
- 13 studies from 6 countries, involving 238 primary care clinicians, were analyzed.
- Three analytical themes emerged: the human-machine relationship, the technologically enhanced clinic, and the societal impact of AI.
- Clinicians expressed views on AI assistance, workplace effects, data privacy, medicolegal liability, and bias.
Conclusions:
- Clinicians perceive AI as a dual-edged sword, capable of enhancing but also complicating primary health care.
- Successful AI integration necessitates careful attention to ethical considerations, technical reliability, and maintaining human oversight.
- Further qualitative research is recommended to explore AI's effects on clinician careers and autonomy.
Related Concept Videos
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Intelligence
Psychodynamic Perspectives on Personality
Psychodynamic theorists argue that unconscious...

