Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema
Published on: January 12, 2017
Do Combined Resistance and Aerobic Exercise Programs Cause an Interference Effect in Women with Breast Cancer? A
Pedro Lopez1,2,3,4, Anderson Rech5,6,7, Maria Petropoulou8
1Grupo de Pesquisa Em Exercício Para Populações Clínicas (GPCLIN), Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. pedro.lopezdacruz@resphealth.uwa.edu.au.
For breast cancer patients, resistance exercise (RE) alone may be better than combined exercise (COMB) for maintaining lean mass and muscle strength. This approach helps minimize potential interference effects during treatment.
Area of Science:
- Exercise oncology
- Cancer rehabilitation
- Breast cancer treatment
Background:
- Exercise medicine is crucial for breast cancer patients, with resistance exercise (RE) improving muscle strength and aerobic exercise (AE) enhancing cardiorespiratory fitness.
- Combining resistance and aerobic exercise (COMB) is hypothesized to cause an interference effect, potentially compromising gains in lean mass and muscle strength in cancer patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the interference effect of COMB versus RE on fatigue, lean mass, physical function, and muscle strength in women with breast cancer.
- To examine demographic, clinical, and exercise prescription moderators influencing these outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A systematic search of seven databases was conducted up to January 2024, with an updated search in April 2025 (PROSPERO CRD42023491118).
- Eligible randomized controlled trials involving women with breast cancer were analyzed using a random-effects network meta-analysis.
- Primary outcomes included cancer-related fatigue, lean mass, physical function, and lower-limb muscle strength, with an interference effect indicated by differences >0.20 standardized mean difference (SMD).
Main Results:
- Both RE and COMB similarly reduced fatigue compared to controls. RE showed greater benefits than COMB for fatigue during surgery and chemotherapy.
- RE and COMB both improved physical function, with RE showing superiority in patients receiving hormone therapy.
- While not significant in main analyses, sensitivity analyses indicated RE favored lean mass and muscle strength over COMB, particularly after excluding outliers.
Conclusions:
- Personalized exercise medicine tailored to treatment characteristics is vital for women with breast cancer.
- Prescribing RE alone may be preferable to COMB to minimize potential interference effects on lean mass and muscle strength, especially during adjuvant and hormonal therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Exercise and Cardiovascular Response
Light to moderate physical activity initiates a series of interconnected responses in the body. The heart rate modestly increases in anticipation of the workout, followed by widespread vasodilation as oxygen consumption by skeletal muscles increases. This results in decreased peripheral resistance, increased capillary blood flow, and accelerated...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...

