Examining the Invariance of a Common Household Food Insecurity Measure Across Various Adult and Child Characteristics
Alexandria B Forté1, Rainier D Masa2, Michael C Lambert2
1School of Social Work, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT.
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
|March 18, 2026
Summary
The Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) is valid across most groups, but adult men and women interpret its questions differently. Further analysis is needed for adult sex comparisons in food insecurity research.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Sociology
- Nutrition Science
Background:
- Food insecurity is a significant public health concern affecting various population segments.
- Accurate measurement of food insecurity is crucial for effective policy and intervention.
- The 10-item Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) is a widely used tool for assessing food insecurity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the construct validity of the HFSSM.
- To determine if the HFSSM yields equivalent measurements across different demographic groups (child sex, race/ethnicity, adult sex, relative status).
- To assess the suitability of the HFSSM for cross-group comparisons in food insecurity research.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study utilizing data from the 2019 National Health Interview Survey child survey (n=1,575).
- Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to assess the HFSSM's factor structure.
- Multiple group CFA was conducted to test for measurement invariance across specified respondent characteristics.
Main Results:
- A one-factor model demonstrated the best fit for the HFSSM data.
- The HFSSM exhibited measurement invariance across child sex, racial and ethnic groups, and relative status.
- Noninvariance was detected for the adult sex variable, indicating differential item functioning.
Conclusions:
- The HFSSM is a valid measure for cross-group comparisons concerning child sex, race/ethnicity, and relative status.
- Differences in interpretation of HFSSM items by adult males and females necessitate cautious use and advanced statistical modeling for sex-based comparisons.
- Future research should incorporate methods to address the observed noninvariance related to adult sex when utilizing the HFSSM.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
4.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.3K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
6.9K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.9K
Two-Way ANOVA
3.5K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
3.5K
Cross-Sectional Research
12.9K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
12.9K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
1.5K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
1.5K
One-Way ANOVA
14.2K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
14.2K


