Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026
Histological Quantification of Chronic Myocardial Infarct in Rats
Published on: December 11, 2016
Machine learning to predict long-term cardiovascular death following myocardial infarction: incremental value of
Liam Scanlon1, Eddy Xiong2, Nicole Ivy Chan2
1Monash Victorian Heart Institute and Monash Health Heart, Victorian Heart Hospital, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Aims:
Machine learning (ML) for prediction of cardiovascular (CV) death following myocardial infarction (MI) has not been well studied. This study sought to define the incremental value of (i) integrating comprehensive echocardiographic data in ML models and (ii) ML approaches over Cox Regression (CPH), for predicting CV death following MI.
Methods And Results:
Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with MI admitted at a tertiary referral hospital, with echocardiography performed within 24 h of admission. Models were trained on a cohort admitted between 2013 and 2017 (n & 1568) and validated on a separate temporal holdout cohort from 2018 to 2021 (n & 1634). Two ML models Gradient Boosted Cox and a DeepSurv Neural Network were developed and compared with conventional multivariable Cox regression. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used for ML model interpretation. In the final study population of 3202 patients (mean age 63.2 ± 12.5 years; 29.2% females), 28.8% had ST-elevation MI and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 52.5 ± 11.2%. At a median follow-up of 4.5 years, there were 139 (4.3%) CV deaths. In the validation set, Gradient Boosted Cox achieved the highest performance (C-index 0.861), compared with conventional Cox regression (C-index 0.813, P & 0.037) and the DeepSurv Neural Network (C-index 0.847, P & 0.38) for the prediction of CV death. Within the GB Cox model, 14 out of the top 20 features for predicting CV death were echocardiographic variables, including LV size, LVEF, and diastolic parameters. Further, in nested ML models, the addition of echocardiographic parameters provided incremental value beyond clinical variables + LVEF alone (C-index 0.861 vs. 0.792, P & 0.017).
Conclusion:
ML integration of comprehensive echocardiographic data leads to improved prediction of CV death following MI, with key measures of LV size and systolic and diastolic function contributing substantially to prognostic models.
