Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
Published on: April 11, 2018
Real-Time Prediction of Lumbar Spine Stress and Displacement Using a Proof-of-Concept Digital Twin Biomechanical
Changha Hwang1, Junseo Kim1, Junsu Bae1
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sejong University, 209, Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05006, Republic of Korea.
Purpose:
To develop a proof-of-concept digital twin framework for real-time prediction and visualization of lumbar spine biomechanics in both native and surgically treated models and to numerically verify its fidelity against coupled MBD-FEA simulations.
Methods:
A hybrid framework combining multibody dynamics (MBD) and finite element (FE) simulations with two sequential Kriging surrogate models was developed. Surrogate Model 1 predicted spinal loads from three-dimensional lumbar rotations; Surrogate Model 2 estimated von Mises stress and displacement from these loads for native and postoperative (TLIF + pedicle screw) spine models. Evaluation consisted of numerical verification against full-order MBD-FEA simulations and a plausibility check by benchmarking against literature-reported L4-L5 intradiscal pressure (IDP) ranges.
Results:
For predefined compound 3-DOF (flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation) lumbar rotational motions, the mean absolute errors (MAEs) of nodal stress and displacement predicted by the digital twin relative to the coupled high-fidelity MBD-FEA outputs were ≤ 0.5% for the native spine and ≤ 0.2% for the postoperative spine. The L4-L5 IDP ranged from 108 to 513 kPa across all motions, indicating physiological levels overlapping with previously reported ranges (30-1530 kPa). However, the predicted values were lower than some reported maxima in flexion (approximately 1500 kPa).
Conclusion:
This framework demonstrated strong predictive performance in terms of numerical agreement, indicating how faithfully the surrogate model reproduces the high-fidelity coupled MBD-FEA reference solutions, and presented a proof-of-concept pipeline capable of real-time execution and visualization. However, experimental and clinical validation of the accuracy of IMU-derived segment kinematics and in vivo biomechanical outputs should be performed in future work.
