Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026
![Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F62334.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
09:34
Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
Published on: February 17, 2022
Imaging Immunotherapy
Egesta Lopci1, Angelo Castello2, Matteo Caracciolo3
1Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (MI), Italy. egesta.lopci@humanitas.it.
Summary
Cancer immunotherapy, including checkpoint inhibitors and CAR T cell therapy, has revolutionized oncology. New guidelines are essential for accurately assessing treatment response due to unique immune-based effects like pseudoprogression.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Cancer immunotherapy leverages adaptive and innate immunity to stimulate anti-tumor responses.
- Key strategies include cytokine therapy, cancer vaccines, and immune checkpoint blockade (e.g., CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors).
- Advances in adoptive T cell therapies, such as CAR T cells, represent a paradigm shift in cancer treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the evolution of immune-specific response evaluation standards in cancer immunotherapy.
- To discuss the application of these standards in clinical trials and their practical implications.
- To provide insights into future advancements in response classification systems for immunotherapies.
Main Methods:
- Review of key immunotherapy approaches and their clinical impact.
- Analysis of challenges in response assessment for immunotherapies.
- Examination of revised guidelines for immunotherapy response evaluation.
- Discussion of phenomena like pseudoprogression and delayed responses.
Main Results:
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1) have shown significant survival benefits across various cancers.
- CAR T cell therapies demonstrate promising clinical efficacy.
- Immunotherapy response patterns (e.g., pseudoprogression, delayed effects) necessitate revised assessment guidelines.
- New guidelines aim to improve therapeutic development and clinical decision-making.
Conclusions:
- Cancer immunotherapy has transformed oncology, with significant progress in checkpoint blockade and cell therapies.
- Accurate response assessment is critical due to unique immunotherapy response patterns.
- Revised guidelines are crucial for advancing clinical trials and patient care in immunotherapy.
- Future research will focus on refining response classification systems for better treatment outcomes.

