Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

04:42
Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation
Published on: June 26, 2018
Long-Term Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation Beyond 24 Months: A PRISMA-ScR-Informed Scoping Review
Jakub Wiśniewski1, Mateusz Szczupak2, Paweł Jan Winklewski3,4
1Department of Neurosurgery, Nicolaus Copernicus Hospital, 80-803 Gdansk, Poland.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|May 27, 2026
Summary
Long-term spinal cord stimulation (SCS) offers durable pain relief for many patients, especially those with spinal pain syndromes or using newer closed-loop systems. However, the evidence base is varied, requiring more standardized research for definitive conclusions.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Pain Management
- Medical Technology Assessment
Background:
- Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a recognized therapy for chronic pain.
- Clinical value hinges on sustained benefits beyond the initial post-implantation phase.
- Existing long-term SCS studies (≥24 months) are fragmented and methodologically diverse.
Purpose of the Study:
- To map the existing clinical literature on SCS outcomes at 24 months or longer.
- To characterize patient populations, SCS modalities, and assessed outcomes.
- To identify gaps in the long-term SCS evidence base.
Main Methods:
- A PRISMA-ScR-informed scoping review was conducted.
- Searches of PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases were performed up to April 2026.
- 65 unique reports representing 11,518 participants were included after rigorous screening.
Main Results:
- The majority of evidence (55/65 reports) was non-randomized.
- Mixed chronic pain and failed back surgery syndrome/persistent spinal pain syndrome were the most common indications.
- Long-term benefits were more frequently supported than complete loss of effect, particularly in spinal pain and newer technologies.
Conclusions:
- Durable SCS benefit is achievable for a significant patient subset, notably in spinal pain syndromes and with contemporary technologies.
- The current evidence is heterogeneous, precluding uniform conclusions across all indications and SCS platforms.
- Future research should focus on indication-specific cohorts and standardized outcome reporting.
