Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
[Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer was introduced in a safe and well controlled manner]
Erik Agger1, Marit Tiefenthal2, Charlotta Larsson3
1med dr, överläkare, kolorektal-sektionen, Skånes uni-versitetssjukhus; medicinska fakulteten, Lunds universitet.
Abstract:
The present nationwide population-based study compared minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with open surgery (OPEN) for colorectal cancer during a period when MIS was introduced in Sweden. The primary analyses demonstrated that MIS was not inferior compared with OPEN regarding short-term outcome for patients operated 2012-2018, nor for long-term outcome assessed as overall survival with surgery performed 2010-2016. In secondary analyses employing Cox regression models, several short-term advantages for MIS were demonstrated, such as lower early mortality, shorter hospital stay and decreased reoperation rate. Regarding long-term outcome, with adjustment for potential statistical confounders, overall survival was better with MIS as compared with OPEN both for colon and rectal cancer, with a relative decrease in risk for overall 5-year mortality by 13% and 12 %, respectively. The authors conclude that MIS was introduced in a safe and well controlled manner, and suggest that MIS should be equally offered to all suitable patients across Sweden.
Insights
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is not inferior to open surgery (OPEN) for colorectal cancer, showing better short-term outcomes and improved long-term survival. MIS offers advantages like reduced mortality and shorter hospital stays.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Public Health
Background:
- Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) adoption for colorectal cancer varies.
- Assessing the safety and efficacy of MIS compared to open surgery (OPEN) is crucial during its introduction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare short-term and long-term outcomes of MIS versus OPEN for colorectal cancer in Sweden.
- To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of MIS during its nationwide introduction.
Main Methods:
- Nationwide population-based study in Sweden.
- Comparison of patients undergoing MIS and OPEN for colorectal cancer (surgery 2010-2018).
- Cox regression models used for secondary analyses of short-term and long-term outcomes.
Main Results:
- MIS was not inferior to OPEN for short-term outcomes (2012-2018) and long-term overall survival (2010-2016).
- MIS demonstrated advantages: lower early mortality, shorter hospital stay, and decreased reoperation rates.
- MIS was associated with better overall survival, reducing 5-year mortality risk by 13% for colon and 12% for rectal cancer.
Conclusions:
- MIS was introduced safely and in a controlled manner for colorectal cancer in Sweden.
- MIS offers significant short-term and long-term benefits compared to OPEN.
- MIS should be equally accessible to all suitable colorectal cancer patients across Sweden.
More Related Videos
12:45Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
07:22Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
Published on: June 13, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...