Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
Published on: July 22, 2025
When consent isn't enough: explaining third-party disapproval of consensual decisions within the contractualist
1Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada czhang61@student.ubc.ca klaurin@psych.ubc.ca.
Abstract:
Why might people make negative moral judgments about others' consensual exchanges? Within triple theory, these should count as mutually beneficial agreements and therefore enjoy uncontroversial moral approval. We propose two explanations: observers of an exchange may (1) do their own cost-benefit analysis or (2) prioritize moral norms. Additional theorizing is required for either of these to align with resource rationality.
Related Concept Videos
Obedience
Cognitive Dissonance
Conformity
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions