Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

09:46
Accessing the Cytotoxicity and Cell Response to Biomaterials
Published on: July 8, 2021
Comparative Effects of Experimental Bioactive Glasses on Dentin Permeability and Tubule Occlusion In Vitro
Julia Moro Destro1, Bruna de Oliveira Reis2, Daniela Alvim Chrisostomo3
1Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Aracatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
|June 25, 2026
Summary
Bioactive glass solutions effectively reduced dentinal fluid flow and hydraulic conductance, indicating dentinal tubule occlusion for managing dentin hypersensitivity. Bioglass® 45S5 and Bioglass® F18 demonstrated the most stable performance against acid challenges.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Dental Materials Science
- Nanotechnology in Dentistry
Background:
- Dentin hypersensitivity is a common clinical condition.
- Dentin fluid flow and hydraulic conductance are key indicators of dentinal tubule patency.
- Bioactive glasses show potential for dentinal tubule occlusion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the in vitro effects of experimental bioactive glass solutions on dentinal fluid flow and hydraulic conductance.
- To assess the efficacy of different bioactive glass formulations in occluding dentinal tubules.
- To determine the stability of these effects under simulated oral demineralizing conditions.
Main Methods:
- Bovine dentin blocks were treated with five different agents: control, Bioglass® 45S5, Bioglass® F18, Biosilicate gel, and Desensibilize Nano P.
- Treatments were applied daily for 15 days.
- Dentinal fluid flow and hydraulic conductance were measured before and after treatment and a citric acid challenge. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for surface analysis.
Main Results:
- All bioactive glass agents reduced dentinal fluid flow and hydraulic conductance compared to the control group.
- Bioglass® 45S5 and Bioglass® F18 exhibited the lowest fluid flow and conductance values post-application.
- While all groups showed reduced values after acid challenge, Bioglass® 45S5 and Bioglass® F18 maintained lower values, indicating superior stability.
Conclusions:
- Bioactive glass-based desensitizing agents effectively reduce dentinal fluid flow and hydraulic conductance, suggesting dentinal tubule occlusion.
- Bioglass® 45S5 and Bioglass® F18 demonstrated the most promising and stable performance in occluding dentinal tubules, even after an acid challenge.
- These findings suggest the potential of Bioglass® 45S5 and Bioglass® F18 for managing dentin hypersensitivity.
