Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus
Published on: March 6, 2019
Philippine Clinical Practice Guidelines for Periodic Health Examination: Screening for Congenital and Developmental
Mary Ann R Abacan1, Kathryn R Baltazar-Braganza2,3, Ian Theodore G Cabaluna4,5
1Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Insights
Philippine clinical practice guidelines recommend screening for congenital and developmental disorders in children. Recommendations cover conditions like critical congenital heart disease and G6PD deficiency, while advising against routine screening for others.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Clinical Genetics
- Public Health
Background:
- Early detection of congenital and developmental disorders is crucial to prevent severe complications like disability and death.
- The Philippines developed clinical practice guidelines (CPG) to standardize screening for these conditions in healthy neonates and children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish evidence-based recommendations for screening congenital and developmental disorders in apparently healthy Filipino children.
- To guide healthcare professionals in the Philippines on the appropriate screening protocols.
Main Methods:
- Adoption of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
- Formulation of 15 priority clinical questions by a multidisciplinary steering committee.
- Systematic evidence review, appraisal, and consensus-based recommendation development by a multisectoral panel.
Main Results:
- Twenty (20) recommendations were established for 15 prioritized screening questions.
- Recommendations support screening for critical congenital heart disease, thalassemia, Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, developmental delay, and autism spectrum disorder.
- Routine screening was not recommended for several inborn errors of metabolism and other genetic conditions.
Conclusions:
- Screening recommendations are based on evidence, disease burden, cost-effectiveness, and population applicability.
- The CPG aims to inform health policies but should be considered alongside existing practices for improving Filipino health outcomes.
Background And Objective:
Congenital and developmental disorders should be detected early to avoid complications such as disability and death. The Philippine clinical practice guidelines (CPG) were developed to guide healthcare professionals on screening for congenital and developmental disorders among apparently healthy neonates and children.
Methods:
Following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to CPG development recommended by the Department of Health (DOH), the steering committee, composed of clinical geneticists, developmental pediatricians, family and community medicine physicians, and ambulatory and community pediatricians, set the objectives of the CPG and formulated clinical questions in consultation with stakeholders. There were 15 priority guideline questions that covered various disorders including inborn errors of metabolism, critical congenital heart disease, developmental delay, learning disabilities, and autism. Evidence review experts systematically reviewed existing clinical practice guidelines, appraised, and summarized the evidence. A multisectoral panel formulated recommendations through a formal consensus based on the evidence summaries. The CPG was externally reviewed prior to publication.
Results:
The CPG provides twenty (20) recommendations on fifteen (15) prioritized questions in the screening for certain congenital and developmental disorders. This CPG contains recommendations for the screening for critical congenital heart disease, thalassemia, Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, developmental delay, and autism spectrum disorder. Recommendations against routine screening of cystic fibrosis, sickle cell disease, methionine adenosyltransferase deficiency, tyrosinemia, long chain 3-hydroxy acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (LCHADD) and mitochondrial trifunctional protein deficiency (MTPD), carnitine palmitoyl transferase types 1 and 2 (CPT1, CPT2) and glutaric aciduria type 2 (GA2), biotidinase deficiency, beta-ketothiolase deficiency, holocarboxylase synthetase deficiency, and isovaleric acidemia were made.
Conclusion:
The consensus panel recommended the screening of certain conditions, based on the available evidence, the burden of disease, the cost of the confirmatory testing, and its applicability to the population. Although this CPG intends to influence the direction of health policies for the general population, it should not be the sole basis for recreating or abolishing practices that aim to improve the health conditions of many Filipinos, particularly those part of the workforce.
Related Concept Videos
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Introduction to Developmental Psychology
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the patient.
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
