Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain
Published on: May 10, 2017
Injectable Therapies for Orofacial Myofascial Pain: A Rapid Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Karolina Grzybowska-Kowalczyk1, Izabella Chyży2, Kamila Chęcińska2
1Uśmiech Family Dental Clinic, Nastrojowa 26, 91-496 Łódź, Poland.
None:
Background/Objectives: Orofacial myofascial pain (MFP) is one of the leading causes of chronic orofacial pain, often resulting in functional limitations and a compromised quality of life. Intramuscular injection therapies appear to be a promising alternative for patients resistant to conservative treatment. The objective of this rapid review was to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials evaluating intramuscular injectable therapies for orofacial myofascial pain. Specifically, the review aimed to compare the clinical effects of different injectable agents on pain intensity, mandibular function, and patient-reported outcomes, and to identify methodological limitations and research gaps within the current evidence base. Methods: A comprehensive search across five databases (ACM, BASE, Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus) was conducted on March 15, 2026. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2022 and 2026 that investigated the use of active injectable agents into the masticatory muscles for clinically diagnosed myofascial pain syndrome were included. Data regarding post-interventional pain intensity, masticatory function, mandibular range of motion, and safety were extracted to compare therapeutic efficacy across interventions. Results: A total of five RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin A, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), magnesium sulfate, and lidocaine, with sample sizes ranging from 30 to 180 participants. Across all interventions, consistent reductions in pain intensity and enhancements in masticatory function were observed. Furthermore, no major adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Intramuscular injectable therapies represent an emerging approach for reducing orofacial myofascial pain, particularly as a treatment for patients with persistent symptoms.
More Related Videos
08:33A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers
Published on: January 5, 2024
07:39Assessment of Nerve Injury-Induced Mechanical Hypersensitivity in Rats Using an Orofacial Operant Pain Assay
Published on: July 26, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic drugs,...
Drug Delivery: Miscellaneous Routes
Oral inhalation and nasal sprays swiftly transfer drugs across the respiratory epithelium's mucosal layer. Inhaled glucocorticoids and bronchodilators directly target lung conditions such as asthma, while fluticasone nasal spray mitigates allergic rhinitis.
Transdermal patches transport drugs through the...
Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Centrally acting drugs are classified into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic drugs such as baclofen, diazepam, and tizanidine inhibit spinal motor neurons and decrease muscle tone. Spasmolytic drugs are administered for severe and chronic spasms due to multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, stroke, and spinal cord and muscle injuries. However,...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses