Ca2+ permeability of cloned and native 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptors

We have used single-cell imaging of fura-2-loaded cells to examine the Ca2+ signals evoked by activation of 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptors in undifferentiated N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells and in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells transfected with either of the two cloned 5-HT3 receptor subunits. The selective 5-HT3 receptor agonist 1-(m-chlorophenyl)-biguanide (mCPBG) caused a concentration-dependent increase in the cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in N1E-115 cells and in HEK 293 cells transfected with either the 5-HT3 A subunit or the 5-HT3 As subunit. In each case, the [Ca2+]i rise was steeply dependent on the mCPBG concentration (nH = 2-4) and abolished by removal of extracellular Ca2+ or addition of ondansetron. Pretreatment of N1E-115 cells with thapsigargin, caffeine, and ryanodine to deplete intracellular Ca2+ stores had no effect on the mCPBG-evoked Ca2+ signals, indicating that they result entirely from stimulated Ca2+ entry. The steep concentration-effect curves therefore are not a consequence of amplification of Ca2+ influx by Ca(2+)-induced Ca2+ release from intracellular stores and probably reflect cooperative activation of 5-HT3 receptors by mCPBG. Depolarization of transfected HEK 293 cells with medium containing increased K+ concentrations invariably failed to evoke an increase in [Ca2+]i, confirming the absence of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and indicating that the mCPBG-evoked rise in [Ca2+]i results from Ca2+ permeation of 5-HT3 receptors. However, in N1E-115 cells and transfected HEK 293 cells, both extracellular Na+ and K+ substantially inhibited the Ca2+ influx evoked by activation of 5-HT3 receptors, possibly by inhibition of agonist binding or by competition with Ca2+ for permeation of the channel. We conclude that 5-HT3 receptors are Ca2+ permeant, that the Ca2+ influx is sufficient to generate a significant rise in [Ca2+]i, and that, because the A and As subunits behave similarly, conflicting electrophysiological analyses of Ca2+ currents cannot be explained by differences between these two subunits.