Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Program evaluation. Key to success

J H Johnson1, N Olesinski

  • 1University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Nursing.

The Journal of Nursing Administration
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterization of process air emissions in automotive production plants.

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2015
Same author

Correlates of adolescent pessimism: A study of the beck hopelessness scale.

Journal of youth and adolescence·2013
Same author

Gonorrheal Prophylaxis.

Journal of the National Medical Association·2010
Same author

Argon bomb pumping of ruby laser.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Characterization of mutagenic subfractions of diesel exhaust modified by ceramic particulate traps.

Environmental science & technology·2009
Same author

Low-coherence heterodyne photon correlation spectroscopy.

Applied optics·2008
Same journal

The CNO-CFO Dyad: A Strategic Driver of Organizational Performance.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Elements of Effective Professional Governance: An Integrative Review.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

New Nurse Well-Being: Implications for Retention, Job Satisfaction, and Patient Safety.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Virtual Nursing Programs in Acute Care Settings: A Scoping Review of Patient, Nurse, and System-Level Outcomes.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Occupational Fatigue and Cognitive Performance Among Front-Line Nurse Leaders: The Interplay of Personal and Work Factors.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Resilience and Well-Being Among Nurse Leaders: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness and Narrative Interventions.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
See all related articles

Evaluating nursing patient care delivery models is crucial for quality and cost-effectiveness. This study introduces a dynamic evaluation process to improve program implementation and strengthen healthcare systems.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing
  • Healthcare Management
  • Program Evaluation

Background:

  • Numerous nursing patient care delivery models have been developed to enhance quality and cost-effectiveness.
  • Many existing models suffer from inadequate evaluation, leading to suboptimal implementation.
  • Effective evaluation is essential for refining healthcare delivery systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present evaluation as a dynamic process for continuous improvement in nursing patient care delivery models.
  • To provide guidelines for effectively evaluating healthcare programs.
  • To emphasize the importance of evaluation in strengthening healthcare systems.

Main Methods:

  • Focus on alternative approaches to patient care delivery.
  • Analysis of the roles of key stakeholders in the evaluation process.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of specific evaluation procedures and guidelines.

    • Main Results:

    • Evaluation, when dynamic, leads to ongoing system improvements.
    • Structured evaluation enhances the optimal implementation of patient care models.
    • Guidelines facilitate effective program assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • A dynamic evaluation process is key to strengthening nursing patient care delivery models.
    • Effective evaluation strategies are necessary for achieving quality and cost-effective patient care.
    • The presented guidelines support robust program assessment in healthcare settings.