Comparative examination of Adalat and Cordaflex in anti-ischaemic therapy

E Palócz1, G Kerkovits

  • 1Municipal Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Hospital, Budapest.

Therapia Hungarica (English Edition)
|January 1, 1993
PubMed

Insights

Cordaflex and Adalat, both containing nifedipine, showed identical anti-ischaemic effects in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. No significant differences were observed in efficacy or side effects between the two medications.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Ischaemic cardiomyopathy poses significant challenges in patient management.
  • Nifedipine is a calcium channel blocker used for managing ischaemic heart conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the anti-ischaemic efficacy of Cordaflex and Adalat in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
  • To evaluate potential differences in blood pressure, heart rate, and side effects between the two nifedipine formulations.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving fifteen ischaemic cardiopathic patients.
  • Patients received identical daily doses (30-80 mg) of Cordaflex and Adalat for one week each, alongside existing nitrate and beta-blocker therapy.
  • Continuous 24-hour ECG monitoring was used to assess ischaemic periods.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in weekly nitroglycerin consumption or the duration/intensity of ischaemic periods were noted in 13 out of 15 patients.
  • Observed changes in one patient during Cordaflex treatment and another during Adalat treatment were attributed to disease progression or spontaneous improvement.
  • No differences were found in blood pressure, heart rate, or side effects between Cordaflex and Adalat.

Conclusions:

  • Cordaflex and Adalat, both containing nifedipine, demonstrate identical anti-ischaemic effects in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
  • The study suggests comparable efficacy and safety profiles for both nifedipine formulations in this patient population.