Related Experiment Videos
An overview of evaluation research methods with implications for nursing staff development
Journal of Nursing Staff Development : JNSD
|May 1, 1993
Summary
This article clarifies evaluation research methods, differentiating them from general research and quality assurance. Nursing staff development examples demonstrate practical applications of these evaluation techniques.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Nursing Education
- Program Evaluation
Background:
- Distinguishing evaluation research from general research methodologies is crucial for accurate assessment.
- Clarifying the unique role of evaluation research in relation to quality assurance processes is essential.
- Understanding these distinctions aids in the effective application of evaluation strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive overview of evaluation research methods.
- To delineate the boundaries between evaluation research, general research methods, and quality assurance.
- To illustrate the practical application of evaluation research methods in nursing staff development.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and conceptual analysis to define evaluation research.
- Comparative analysis to differentiate evaluation research from research methods and quality assurance.
- Case study examples from nursing staff development to demonstrate methods.
Main Results:
- Evaluation research is presented as a distinct field with specific methodologies.
- Key differences between evaluation research, research methods, and quality assurance are highlighted.
- Practical examples showcase the utility of evaluation research in enhancing nursing staff development programs.
Conclusions:
- Evaluation research offers a unique framework for assessing programs and interventions.
- Clear differentiation from other research and assurance approaches enhances methodological rigor.
- The application in nursing staff development underscores the value of evaluation research in practice.