Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developmental levels of interdisciplinary collaborative practice committees

G D Velianoff1, C Neely, S Hall

  • 1Charleston Area Medical Center, West Virginia.

The Journal of Nursing Administration
|July 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing DSA-negative and DSA-positive antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplants: Results from the Trifecta-Heart study.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation·2026
Same author

First Evidence of Solar Neutrino Interactions on ^{13}C.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Measurement of Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation at SNO.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Regional differences in primary graft dysfunction: A report from the international consortium on PGD.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation·2025
Same author

Epithelial-Stromal Interactions in Barrett's Esophagus Modeled in Human Organ Chips.

Gastro hep advances·2024
Same author

A field programmable gate array based Langmuir probe system for measurement of plasma parameters at 500 kHz in a high-power impulse magnetron sputtering plasma.

The Review of scientific instruments·2024
Same journal

The CNO-CFO Dyad: A Strategic Driver of Organizational Performance.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Elements of Effective Professional Governance: An Integrative Review.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

New Nurse Well-Being: Implications for Retention, Job Satisfaction, and Patient Safety.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Virtual Nursing Programs in Acute Care Settings: A Scoping Review of Patient, Nurse, and System-Level Outcomes.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Occupational Fatigue and Cognitive Performance Among Front-Line Nurse Leaders: The Interplay of Personal and Work Factors.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Resilience and Well-Being Among Nurse Leaders: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness and Narrative Interventions.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
See all related articles

Interdisciplinary collaborative practice committees are vital in healthcare. This study introduces a simple evaluation tool to assess the effectiveness and function of these essential healthcare committees.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Interprofessional Education
  • Collaborative Practice

Background:

  • Interdisciplinary collaborative practice committees are a key strategy in modern healthcare systems.
  • Effective functioning of these committees is crucial for improving patient care and operational efficiency.
  • There is a need for standardized methods to evaluate the performance of these collaborative groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a practical evaluation tool for interdisciplinary collaborative practice committees.
  • To provide a mechanism for assessing the level and functioning of these committees.
  • To support the continuous improvement of interdisciplinary healthcare teams.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a straightforward evaluation instrument.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of the tool to assess committee performance.
  • Analysis of the tool's utility in determining committee level and function.

    • Main Results:

    • The presented tool offers an easy method for evaluating interdisciplinary committees.
    • The tool can effectively determine the operational level and functioning of these committees.
    • Initial findings suggest the tool's benefit in guiding committee development.

    Conclusions:

    • An accessible evaluation tool can significantly aid in assessing interdisciplinary collaborative practice committees.
    • Implementing such tools can enhance the effectiveness and outcomes of healthcare collaboration.
    • This evaluation mechanism supports the strategic importance of interdisciplinary teamwork in healthcare.