Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Blunt abdominal trauma

S A Colucciello1

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.

Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
|February 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma requires advanced methods beyond physical exams. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and CT scans are key tools, but DPL offers higher accuracy for critical injuries.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Abdominal Trauma.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

New diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism.

Annals of emergency medicine·2000
Same author

Misdiagnosis of appendicitis in nonpregnant women of childbearing age.

The Journal of emergency medicine·1995
Same author

Successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest using sublingual injection for medication delivery.

Annals of emergency medicine·1993

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Trauma Surgery
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Physical examination and plain radiography are insufficient for diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma.
  • Laboratory tests can suggest intra-abdominal injury but are not definitive.
  • Diagnostic interventions like ultrasound and laparoscopy require further study in the US.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the role of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and computed tomography (CT) in managing blunt abdominal trauma.
  • To compare the accuracy and limitations of DPL and CT in identifying intra-abdominal injuries.
  • To guide the selection of diagnostic tools based on patient stability and injury severity.

Main Methods:

  • Review of diagnostic interventions for blunt abdominal trauma, focusing on DPL and CT.
  • Comparison of DPL's high accuracy (97%) with CT's non-invasive nature and reader dependency.
  • Analysis of potential delays and missed injuries associated with CT scans.

Main Results:

  • DPL demonstrates high accuracy but may lead to non-therapeutic laparotomies due to oversensitivity.
  • CT is less invasive and may reduce unnecessary surgeries but is reader-dependent and potentially less sensitive than DPL.
  • CT is suitable for stable patients, but delays can be dangerous for critically injured individuals.

Conclusions:

  • Immediate DPL or direct operating room transport is crucial for critically injured patients.
  • CT is valuable for screening stable patients, but its delays pose risks.
  • Refining diagnostic strategies is essential for prompt recognition of surgical abdominal trauma.

Related Experiment Videos