Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vacuum-assisted delivery

M C Williams1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.

Clinics in Perinatology
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Choosing between forceps and vacuum extraction for assisted vaginal delivery involves weighing risks. Vacuum extraction is generally easier to apply and may reduce cesarean births, but both methods require careful patient assessment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hippocampal Dosimetry and Implication for Treatment Planning in Patients Undergoing Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Limited Brain Metastases.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2026
Same author

Correlates of HIV-1 control after combination immunotherapy.

Nature·2025
Same author

Combination immunotherapy induces post-intervention control of HIV.

Research square·2025
Same author

Coronary artery calcification is associated with mortality independent of pulmonary embolism severity: a retrospective cohort study.

Clinical radiology·2019
Same author

Breast arterial calcification on mammography and risk of coronary artery disease: a SCOT-HEART sub-study.

Clinical radiology·2019
Same author

Display colour scale effects on diagnostic performance and reader agreement in cardiac CT and prostate apparent diffusion coefficient assessment.

Clinical radiology·2018
Same journal

Breathing Physiology into the Art of Neonatal Respiratory Care.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

The Science and Art of Neonatal Respiratory Care.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Ex Utero Artificial Womb Support: Promising Future for Extremely Preterm Infants.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Advances in the Use of Cell-Based Therapies for Prevention of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Evaluation and Management of Genetic Respiratory Disorders Presenting as Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in the Newborn Infant.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Modern Surfactant Delivery Methods with a Focus on Implementation of Surfactant Administration Through Laryngeal and Supraglottic Airways.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Neonatal Care

Background:

  • Assisted vaginal delivery is a common obstetric procedure.
  • Instrument choice between forceps and vacuum extraction presents distinct advantages and disadvantages.
  • Patient-specific factors significantly influence maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and synthesize literature regarding the selection of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery.
  • To compare the risks and benefits associated with forceps versus vacuum extraction.
  • To guide clinical decision-making in optimizing outcomes for assisted vaginal births.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of existing studies on assisted vaginal delivery instruments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with forceps and vacuum extraction.
  • Discussion of factors influencing instrument choice and procedural success.

    • Main Results:

    • Forceps: More difficult application, higher risk of maternal soft tissue trauma and neonatal facial injuries.
    • Vacuum Extraction: Easier application, potential for scalp and intracranial trauma, but may decrease cesarean section rates.
    • Both methods carry risks; judicious use and careful patient selection are crucial for minimizing complications.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of assisted delivery instrument should be individualized based on fetal station, presentation, and maternal/fetal conditions.
    • Vacuum extraction may be preferred in certain situations due to ease of use and potential to reduce cesarean deliveries.
    • Operator experience and willingness to reassess the procedure are critical for safe assisted vaginal delivery.