Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evolution of a companywide validation program

K J Platt1

  • 1American Cyanamid Company, Princeton, NJ 08543-0400, USA.

Quality Assurance (San Diego, Calif.)
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interexaminer reliability of the palpation of trigger points in the trunk and lower limb muscles.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2000
Same author

The acceleration of linear DNA during pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Biopolymers·1989
Same journal

Peer Review as a QA Tool in Environmental Applications.

Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)·2006
Same journal

The use of double anonymity in peer review: a decision whose time has come?

Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)·2006
Same journal

Major issues in quality assessment and improvement of clinical hyperbaric services: an international perspective.

Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)·2006
Same journal

Evaluation of customer satisfaction level of different projects.

Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)·2006
Same journal

Establishing tolerance levels for customer complaints.

Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)·2006
Same journal

The historical impact of ISO 9000 on Lebanese firms.

Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)·2005
See all related articles

Establishing a robust computer validation program requires comprehensive policies and procedures. A structured, step-by-step approach ensures consistent, long-term validation of computerized systems.

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Regulatory Compliance
  • Quality Management

Background:

  • Computerized systems are integral to modern operations, necessitating rigorous validation.
  • An unstructured approach to validation is insufficient for sustained, consistent activities.
  • Developing a strong computer validation program requires a deliberate, foundational strategy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the essential components of a successful computer validation program.
  • To emphasize the importance of policies, guidelines, and procedures in validation.
  • To describe a structured methodology for building and maintaining computer validation.

Main Methods:

  • Establishing a companywide policy and appointing a dedicated administrator.
  • Forming a computer validation committee for departmental leadership and guideline development.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Creating system inventories, classifying, and prioritizing systems for validation.
  • Developing departmental standard operating procedures for routine validation activities.
  • Implementing quality assurance procedures for oversight throughout the validation process.
  • Main Results:

    • A structured, step-by-step approach, though not rigidly ordered, ensures all necessary components are addressed.
    • A companywide policy, committee oversight, and departmental SOPs are critical for consistency.
    • System inventories and prioritization are key to managing validation efforts effectively.
    • Quality assurance involvement is vital for the overall integrity of the validation process.

    Conclusions:

    • A successful computer validation program is built upon a foundation of clear policies, guidelines, and procedures.
    • Ongoing, consistent computer validation requires a structured, evolving program, not an ad-hoc approach.
    • Key elements include companywide policy, a dedicated committee, departmental SOPs, and quality assurance oversight.