Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Unique CT imaging advantages. Hemorrhage and calcification

J L Go1, C S Zee

  • 1Department of Radiology, Los Angeles County/USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.

Neuroimaging Clinics of North America
|July 23, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Computed tomography (CT) excels at detecting acute intracranial hemorrhage and calcifications. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, particularly FLAIR, is more sensitive for subacute/chronic hemorrhage staging and subarachnoid hemorrhage detection.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Subcortical Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes in a Healthy Elderly Population; Stroke Risk Factors, Ultrasound, and Hemostasis Findings.

Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging·2016
Same author

Petrous apex cholesterol granuloma: pictorial review of radiological considerations in diagnosis and surgical histopathology.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2013
Same author

Perfusion and permeability MR imaging of gliomas.

Technology in cancer research & treatment·2011
Same author

A unique magnetic resonance imaging feature of glioblastoma multiforme: the 'pseudopalisade' sign.

The Journal of international medical research·2010
Same author

The trigeminal nerve.

Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR·2002
Same author

A phantom study of the geometric accuracy of computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging stereotactic localization with the Leksell stereotactic system.

Neurosurgery·2001

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Neurological Imaging

Background:

  • Computed tomography (CT) is the preferred imaging method for acute intracranial hemorrhage and calcification detection.
  • Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offers superior sensitivity for aging and staging hemorrhage in subacute and chronic phases.
  • Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences enhance MR imaging's ability to detect subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of CT and MR imaging in detecting intracranial hemorrhage and calcification.
  • To highlight the strengths and limitations of each imaging modality for specific neurological conditions.
  • To discuss factors influencing calcification detectability on CT.

Main Methods:

  • Review of imaging characteristics of intracranial hemorrhage and calcification on CT and MR.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of sensitivity and specificity between CT and MR for different hemorrhage stages.
  • Analysis of MR signal variability in calcification and its impact on detection.

    • Main Results:

    • CT is superior for acute hemorrhage and calcification detection.
    • MR imaging, especially FLAIR, is more sensitive for subacute/chronic hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage.
    • Calcification detectability on MR is limited by variable signal characteristics, particularly on T1-weighted images.
    • CT parameters like slice thickness and window settings affect calcification detection.

    Conclusions:

    • CT and MR imaging have complementary roles in evaluating intracranial hemorrhage and calcification.
    • The choice of imaging modality depends on the clinical indication and suspected pathology.
    • Optimizing CT parameters is crucial for accurate calcification assessment.