Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Benchmarking radiation protection programs

J Shapiro1, J P Ring

  • 1Harvard University, Environmental Health and Safety, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

Health Physics
|February 4, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ASO Visual Abstract: Clinical Course and Dedifferentiation in Atypical Lipomatous Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis of Surveillance and Surgical Management.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Clinical Course and Dedifferentiation of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis of Surveillance and Surgical Management.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Real-world characteristics and outcomes of patients with BRAF<sup>V600E</sup>-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia: the COALA project.

ESMO real world data and digital oncology·2026
Same author

Impact of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX over upfront resection in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer-an international, multicentre, real-world analysis.

ESMO real world data and digital oncology·2026
Same author

Developing the One-Minute Preceptor Model to Improve Clinical Teaching in Emergency Dental Care.

JDR clinical and translational research·2025
Same author

Evaluation of a machine learning tool for the early identification of patients with undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis - A retrospective population-based study.

Journal of translational autoimmunity·2023
Same journal

Assessment of Health Risks of Adults and Children Due to Consumption of Uranium in Groundwater from Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radiation Protection Abstracts, Volume 46, Number 1.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Specialized Radiological Assets for Navigable Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Virtual and Augmented Reality.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

DoseBusters: A Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Game for Radiation Protection and Detection.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radioactivity in Bottled Drinking Water from Greater Dhaka City and Concomitant Ingestion Doses to Consumers.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Radiation Dose and Protection Practices in Neonatal Radiography in NICUs.

Health physics·2026
See all related articles

Benchmarking institutional programs revealed key performance metrics, including user and staff ratios. This analysis effectively guided staffing level decisions for research and clinical programs.

Area of Science:

  • Health services research
  • Organizational science

Background:

  • Institutional program reviews are essential for resource allocation and operational efficiency.
  • Benchmarking provides a comparative framework to assess performance and identify areas for improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a modest benchmarking project involving eight institutions.
  • To derive and analyze key performance metrics for research and clinical programs.
  • To identify factors influencing institutional differences and provide guidance on staffing levels.

Main Methods:

  • A benchmarking project was implemented with eight participating institutions.
  • Data were collected and analyzed to derive key performance indicators.
  • Metrics included Registered Users per total Technical Staff, Principal Investigators per Senior IP staff, and Principal Investigators per HP staff.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Key metrics derived: Registered Users per total Technical Staff (mean 284, SD 42%), Principal Investigators per Senior IP staff (mean 68.7, SD 49.6%), and Principal Investigators per HP staff (mean 44.7, SD 34.4%).
  • Significant variations among institutions were observed and reasons for these differences were identified.
  • The benchmarking exercise proved effective in informing staffing level recommendations.

Conclusions:

  • Benchmarking is a valuable tool for program review and operational assessment in academic and clinical settings.
  • The derived metrics offer insights into institutional performance and resource utilization.
  • This study successfully guided staffing level recommendations through comparative analysis.