Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Daniel H Weissman

Showing results (11-20 of 78) with videos related to

Pageof 8
Sort By:
Plos One|February 12, 2014
A bottleneck model of set-specific captureKatherine Sledge Moore, Daniel H Weissman
Frontiers in Psychology|June 30, 2011
Succumbing to bottom-up biases on task choice predicts increased switch costs in the voluntary task switching paradigmJoseph M Orr, Daniel H Weissman
Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)|July 26, 2008
Anterior cingulate cortex makes 2 contributions to minimizing distractionJoseph M Orr, Daniel H Weissman
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics|August 3, 2010
Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigmKatherine Sledge Moore, Daniel H Weissman
Acta Psychologica|January 28, 2017
An attentional mechanism for minimizing cross-modal distractionLauren D Grant, Daniel H Weissman
Acta Psychologica|November 9, 2018
Turning distractors into targets increases the congruency sequence effectLauren D Grant, Daniel H Weissman
Acta Psychologica|June 4, 2015
Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effectJames R Schmidt, Daniel H Weissman
Psychological Research|June 22, 2015
Congruency sequence effects and previous response times: conflict adaptation or temporal learning?James R Schmidt, Daniel H Weissman
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition|August 11, 2022
The binary structure of event files generalizes to abstract features: A nonhierarchical explanation of task set boundaries for the congruency sequence effectLauren D Grant, Daniel H Weissman
Psychological Research|December 12, 2025
Congruency effects can interact even when controlling for the reactivation aversion effect: implications for the generality-specificity paradox in hybrid distractor-interference tasksMatthew G Dunaway, Daniel H Weissman
Pageof 8

Showing results (11-20 of 78) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 8
Plos One|February 12, 2014
A bottleneck model of set-specific captureKatherine Sledge Moore, Daniel H Weissman
Frontiers in Psychology|June 30, 2011
Succumbing to bottom-up biases on task choice predicts increased switch costs in the voluntary task switching paradigmJoseph M Orr, Daniel H Weissman
Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)|July 26, 2008
Anterior cingulate cortex makes 2 contributions to minimizing distractionJoseph M Orr, Daniel H Weissman
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics|August 3, 2010
Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigmKatherine Sledge Moore, Daniel H Weissman
Acta Psychologica|January 28, 2017
An attentional mechanism for minimizing cross-modal distractionLauren D Grant, Daniel H Weissman
Acta Psychologica|November 9, 2018
Turning distractors into targets increases the congruency sequence effectLauren D Grant, Daniel H Weissman
Acta Psychologica|June 4, 2015
Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effectJames R Schmidt, Daniel H Weissman
Psychological Research|June 22, 2015
Congruency sequence effects and previous response times: conflict adaptation or temporal learning?James R Schmidt, Daniel H Weissman
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition|August 11, 2022
The binary structure of event files generalizes to abstract features: A nonhierarchical explanation of task set boundaries for the congruency sequence effectLauren D Grant, Daniel H Weissman
Psychological Research|December 12, 2025
Congruency effects can interact even when controlling for the reactivation aversion effect: implications for the generality-specificity paradox in hybrid distractor-interference tasksMatthew G Dunaway, Daniel H Weissman
Pageof 8