Showing results (1-10 of 87) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 9
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition|January 30, 2013
When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigmMark J Huff, Glen E BodnerQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)|September 7, 2018
Item-specific and relational processing both improve recall accuracy in the DRM paradigmMark J Huff, Glen E BodnerJournal of Memory and Language|July 15, 2014
All varieties of encoding variability are not created equal: Separating variable processing from variable tasksMark J Huff, Glen E BodnerMemory & Cognition|May 14, 2020
Pure-list production improves item recognition and sometimes also improves source memoryGlen E Bodner, Mark J Huff, Alexander TaikhFrontiers in Psychology|December 17, 2020
Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring ProcessesMark J Huff, Glen E Bodner, Matthew R GretzApplied Cognitive Psychology|March 8, 2016
Reducing the Misinformation Effect Through Initial Testing: Take Two Tests and Recall Me in the Morning?Mark J Huff, Camille C Weinsheimer, Glen E BodnerQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)|September 29, 2019
Protective effects of testing across misinformation formats in the household scene paradigmRosemary S Pereverseff, Glen E Bodner, Mark J HuffPsychonomic Bulletin & Review|May 24, 2014
Effects of distinctive encoding on correct and false memory: a meta-analytic review of costs and benefits and their origins in the DRM paradigmMark J Huff, Glen E Bodner, Jonathan M FawcettPsychological Research|August 30, 2019
Distinctive encoding of a subset of DRM lists yields not only benefits, but also costs and spilloversMark J Huff, Glen E Bodner, Matthew R GretzMemory (Hove, England)|July 9, 2016
Getting at the source of distinctive encoding effects in the DRM paradigm: evidence from signal-detection measures and source judgmentsGlen E Bodner, Mark J Huff, Raymond W Lamontagne, et al.Pageof 9