Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.4K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.4K
Conformity01:20

Conformity

45.2K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.2K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

23.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.2K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

On Native American Boarding Schools, Racial Bias, and Perceptions of Americanness Versus Foreignness.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same author

A Distributional Response Time Analysis of the Perceptual Disfluency Effect.

Journal of cognition·2025
Same author

Measuring the semantic priming effect across many languages.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Concerns About Theorizing, Relevance, Generalizability, and Methodology Across Two Crises in Social Psychology.

International review of social psychology·2025
Same author

Concerns About Replicability Across Two Crises in Social Psychology.

International review of social psychology·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.4K

共识会议将超过整合性实验.

Maximilian A Primbs1, Leonie A Dudda2,3, Pia K Andresen4

  • 1Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands max.primbs@ru.nl hannah.peetz@ru.nl, https://max-primbs.netlify.app/.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
|February 4, 2024
PubMed
概括

协商一致会议为科学协调和整合提供了一个比整合性实验更有效的解决方案. 这些会议帮助研究人员与理论观点保持一致,并为未来的研究建立标准化的措施.

更多相关视频

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.4K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.4K

科学领域:

  • 科学方法科学方法学
  • 研究协调研究协调研究.
  • 跨学科合作跨学科合作

背景情况:

  • 缺乏科学主张的协调和整合,阻碍了进步.
  • 当前的研究实践往往导致碎片化发现.
  • 需要在科学研究中采用标准化的方法.

研究的目的:

  • 提出共识会议作为科学协调的综合性实验的优越替代方案.
  • 概述共识会议在标准化研究措施和优先考虑因素方面的好处.
  • 为了应对在科学研究中整合不同理论观点的挑战.

主要方法:

  • 该研究提出了共识会议的理论框架.
  • 它将拟议的方法与整合性实验进行对比.
  • 共识会议的关键组成部分包括理论对齐,因素优先级,测量标准化和定义效果大小.

主要成果:

  • 预计共识会议比整合性实验更有效.
  • 预计这种方法将改善科学主张的协调和整合.
  • 衡量标准的标准化和对效果大小的协议将促进更清晰的研究结果.

结论:

  • 协商一致会议是推动科学一体化的更有效策略.
  • 这种协作方法可以克服科学研究现有的碎片化.
  • 实施共识会议可以导致更有凝聚力和更有影响力的科学发现.